Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36562933›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2023

Changes in Medication Use During Pregnancy for Women with Chronic Conditions: An Analysis of Claims Data.

Rohini K Hernandez, Sonja S Nakasian, Lisa Bollinger, Brian D Bradbury, Susan S Jick, Paul Muntner, Eric Ng, Victoria Chia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rohini K HernandezCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA. rohinih@amgen.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4353-7292
Sonja S NakasianGraticule, Inc., Newton, USA.
Lisa BollingerGlobal Patient Safety, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, USA.
Brian D BradburyCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
Susan S JickBoston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Paul MuntnerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, USA.
Eric NgGlobal Patient Safety, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, USA.
Victoria ChiaCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USBoston University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvaluation of drug safety during pregnancy is dependent on the number of exposed women during routine clinical practice with data available for analysis. We examined medication fills in pregnant and nonpregnant women within select disease cohorts: general population, migraine, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia to explore the potential use of claims data to assess medication use and safety during pregnancy.

methodsThis cohort study, using IBM MarketScan® Research Databases claims data, included women 10-54 years of age with pregnancy resulting in a liveborn infant between January 2010 and September 2015 and matched nonpregnant women. Medication use (antidepressants, antihypertensives, sedatives, glucose-lowering medications, antiepileptics, antipsychotics, lipid-lowering medications) was abstracted from pharmacy claims 180 days before last menstrual period through 180 days postdelivery.

resultsAmong 753,760 women in the general pregnancy population (including 73,268 migraine, 50,155 hyperlipidemia, and 8361 diabetes; non-exclusive cohorts), antidepressants, antihypertensives, and sedatives were the most commonly used medications during pregnancy. Medications of interest were less commonly used in the pregnancy cohort than in the matched nonpregnant cohort within each time period (e.g., 3.7% vs 13.1% antidepressant use in 1st trimester). Most prescription fills were less common during pregnancy then pre-pregnancy. Post-pregnancy, prescription fills increased to or exceeded pre-pregnancy levels, except antihypertensive and glucose-lowering medications, which increased during pregnancy.

conclusionsMedication use among pregnant women was low and different from that among matched nonpregnant women. The underlying size of large commercial claims databases offer opportunities for efficient evaluation of potential safety concerns, particularly for rare drug exposures, compared to traditional pregnancy registries.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersPharmaceutical ServicesAntidepressive AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyAntidepressive AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsDiabetesHyperlipidemiaMigrainePharmacovigilancePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36562933
OpenAlexW4312114431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.