Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36562866›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue research2023

Biological nerve conduit model with de-epithelialized human amniotic membrane and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell sheet for repair of peripheral nerve defects.

Mahmut Muhsin Yılmaz, Özge Ekin Akdere, Menemşe Gümüşderelioğlu, Gökçe Kaynak Bayrak, Sena Koç, Ayşen Erdem, Meltem Tuncer, Özbeyen Atalay, Gülnur Take Kaplanoğlu, Saadet Özen Akarca Dizakar and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mahmut Muhsin YılmazDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe Universitesi Eriskin Hastanesi, Kat B, Plastik Cerrahi Anabilim Dali, 06100, Sihhiye - Ankara, Turkey.
Özge Ekin AkdereBioengineering Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Menemşe GümüşderelioğluBioengineering and Chemical Engineering Departments, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Gökçe Kaynak BayrakBiomedical Engineering Department, İzmir Bakırçay University, İzmir, Turkey.
Sena KoçChemical Engineering Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ayşen ErdemDepartment of Physiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Meltem TuncerDepartment of Physiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Özbeyen AtalayDepartment of Physiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Gülnur Take KaplanoğluDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Saadet Özen Akarca DizakarDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mert CalisDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe Universitesi Eriskin Hastanesi, Kat B, Plastik Cerrahi Anabilim Dali, 06100, Sihhiye - Ankara, Turkey. mertcalis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9907-2220

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu 119S133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, a biological conduit, consisting of an adipocyte-derived mesenchymal stem cell (AdMSCs) sheet and amniotic membrane (AM), was designed for the reconstruction of peripheral nerve defects. To evaluate the effect of the produced conduit on neural regeneration, a 10-mm sciatic nerve defect was created in rats, and experiments were carried out on six groups, i.e., sham control group (SC), negative control group (NC), nerve autograft group (NG), the biological conduit (AdMSCs + AM) group, the commercial PGA tube conduit (PGA) group, and the conduit only consisting of AM (AM) group. The effects of different nerve repair methods on the peripheral nerve and gastrocnemius muscle were evaluated by functional, histological, and immunohistochemical tests. When the number of myelinated axons was compared between the groups of AdMSCs + AM and PGA, it was higher in the AdMSCs + AM group (p < 0.05). The percentage of gastrocnemius collagen bundle area of AdMSCs + AM group was found to be statistically lower than the PGA group (p < 0.05). The muscle fiber diameter of AdMSCs + AM group was lower than that of the NG group, but significantly higher than that of the PGA group and the AM group (p < 0.001). Muscle weight index was significantly higher in the AdMSCs + AM group compared to the PGA group (p < 0.05). It was observed that nerve regeneration was faster in the AdMSCs + AM group, and there was an earlier improvement in pin-prick score and sciatic functional index compared to the PGA group and the AM group. In conclusion, the biological conduit prepared from the AdMSCs sheet and AM is regarded as a new biological conduit that can be used as an alternative treatment method to nerve autograft in clinical applications.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsNerve TissueAmnionAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansNerve RegenerationRatsSciatic NerveAdipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cellsAmniotic membraneCell sheetNerve conduitPeripheral nerve defects

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.