Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36562865›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue research2023

The cellular 3D printer of a marine bristle worm-chaetogenesis in Platynereis dumerilii (Audouin & Milne Edwards, 1834) (Annelida).

Ekin Tilic, Tim Herkenrath, Gregor Kirfel, Thomas Bartolomaeus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ekin TilicInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Animal Ecology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, An der Immenburg 1, Bonn, 53121, Germany. etilic@evolution.uni-bonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-322X
Tim HerkenrathInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Animal Ecology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, An der Immenburg 1, Bonn, 53121, Germany.
Gregor KirfelInstitute of Cell Biology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Ulrich-Haberland-Str. 61a, Bonn, 53121, Germany.
Thomas BartolomaeusInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Animal Ecology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, An der Immenburg 1, Bonn, 53121, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5662-7919

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft INST 217/784-1 FUGGH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 896938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Annelid chaetae are extracellular chitinous structures that are formed in an extracellular epidermal invagination, the chaetal follicle. The basalmost cell of this follicle, the chaetoblast, serves like a 3D-printer as it dynamically shapes the chaeta. During chaetogenesis apical microvilli of the chaetoblast form the template for the chaeta, any structural details result from modulating the microvilli pattern. This study describes this process in detail in the model organism Platynereis dumerilii and clarifies some aspects of chaetogenesis in its close relative Nereis vexillosa, the first annelid in which the ultrastructure of chaetogenesis had been described. Nereid species possess compound chaetae characteristic for numerous subgroups of errant annelids. The distal most section of these chaetae is movable; a hinge connects this part of the chaeta to the shaft. Modulation of the microvilli and differences in their structure, diameter and number of microvilli, and their withdrawal and reappearance determine the shape of these compound chaetae. Chaetal structure and pattern also change during life history. While larvae possess a single type of chaeta (in addition to internal aciculae), juveniles and adults possess two types of chaetae that are replaced by large paddle-shaped chaetae in swimming epitokous stages. Chaetogenesis is a continuous process that lasts during the entire lifespan. The detailed developmental sequence of chaetae and their site of formation are very similar within species and species groups. We expect that similarity results from a conserved gene regulatory network making this an optimal system to test the phylogenetic affinity of taxa and the homology of their chaetae.

Indexed as

AnnelidaPolychaetaAnimalsPhylogenyChitinMicrovilliMorphogenesisPolychaetaUltrastructure

Identifiers

PMID36562865
PMCPMC9889436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.