Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2023
Ultrasound-guided reduction of intussusception in infants in a developing world: saline hydrostatic or pneumatic technique?
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic enema reduction for intussusception in children younger than 12 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of nonoperative management for pediatric intussusception in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Air enema reduction versus hydrostatic enema reduction for intussusceptions in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Failed ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction in pediatric intussusception: surgical-pathological characterization of failure phenotypes under a standardized protocol.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis of research progress in pediatric intussusception from the Web of Science Core Collection over the past 15 years.Medicine · 2026Article
- Determinants of ultrasound-guided reduction failure and pathological lead points in pediatric intussusception.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Pneumatic versus liquid enema reduction in the management of pediatric intussusception: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of critical diagnostic landmarks obtained from comparison of symptomatic small bowel intussusception relevant to surgically proven 16 pediatric cases.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025Article
- A REVIEW OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PNEUMATIC ENEMA IN THE REDUCTION OF INTUSSUSCEPTION IN CHILDREN: INSIGHTS FROM A TEACHING HOSPITAL IN NIGERIA.Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine · 2024Article
- Practice variation in the management of pediatric intussusception: a narrative review.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Review
- Risk factors for failure of enema reduction of intussusception in children.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Ultrasound-guided pneumatic reduction of intussusception in children: 15-year experience in a tertiary children's hospital.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Non-Operative Reduction of Childhood Intussusception in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Emerging Challenges.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-operative reduction has emerged as first line in the management of uncomplicated intussusception. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of ultrasound-guided saline hydrostatic reduction and ultrasound-guided pneumatic reduction of intussusception in infants. This is a prospective study of infants with uncomplicated intussusception confirmed by ultrasound over a period of 21 months from December 2018 to August 2020. Fifty-two (69.3%) out of seventy-five infants were eligible and randomized based on simple random sampling technique into two groups: Group A included patients who had ultrasound-guided hydrostatic (saline) reduction; Group B included patients who had ultrasound-guided pneumatic (air) reduction. The success rates, time to reduction and complication rates were assessed. The success rates, between the saline hydrostatic reduction group and pneumatic reduction group, were comparable [17 (65.4%) versus 19 (73.1%); relative risk (RR) 0.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6-1.2; p = 0.54]. The mean time to reduction was higher in the saline hydrostatic reduction group (15.4 ± 5.1 min versus 10.8 ± 4.1 min; p = 0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in the perforation and recurrence rates between the two groups.
conclusionSaline hydrostatic reduction and pneumatic reduction of uncomplicated intussusception under ultrasound guidance in infants might have comparable outcomes. However, pneumatic reduction may be faster. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Ileocolic intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in infants. • Ultrasonography is useful in the diagnosis and non-operative treatment of ileocolic intussusception. WHAT IS NEW: • Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic enema and ultrasound-guided pneumatic enema are similarly effective and safe techniques in the reduction of ileocolic intussusception. • Reduction of ileocolic intussusception under ultrasound guidance is a great technique that may prove useful in the developing world due to lower cost of required equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.