Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36562766›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2023

Prevalence of refractive errors among school-going children in a multistate study in India.

Elizabeth Joseph, Meena Ck, Rahul Kumar, Mary Sebastian, Catherine M Suttle, Nathan Congdon, Sheeladevi Sethu, Gudlavalleti Vs Murthy, REACH Research Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Retinoscopes: Past and present.World journal of methodology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence and Distribution of Refractive Errors among School-going Adolescents: A Retrospective Analysis from Madhya Pradesh, India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth JosephDepartment of Ophthalmology, Little Flower Hospital and Research Centre, Angamaly, Kerala, India.
Meena CkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Little Flower Hospital and Research Centre, Angamaly, Kerala, India.
Rahul KumarOrbis India Country office, ORBIS International, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Mary SebastianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Little Flower Hospital and Research Centre, Angamaly, Kerala, India.
Catherine M SuttleOptometry and Visual Science, City University London, London, UK.
Nathan CongdonResearch, Orbis International, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9866-3416
Sheeladevi SethuOrbis India Country office, ORBIS International, Gurugram, Haryana, India Sheeladevi.sethu@orbis.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6561-2882
Gudlavalleti Vs MurthyIndian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, India.
REACH Research Group
Little Flower Hospital & Research Centre · INCity, University of London · GBIndian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimMuch existing data on childhood refractive error prevalence in India were gathered in local studies, many now dated. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence, severity and determinants of refractive errors among school-going children participating in a multistate vision screening programme across India.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, vision screening was conducted in children aged 5-18 years at schools in five states using a pocket vision screener. Refractive error was measured using retinoscopy, and subjective refraction and was defined both by spherical equivalent (SE) and spherical ametropia, as myopia ≤-0.5 diopters (D), hyperopia ≥+1.0 D and/or astigmatism as >0.5 D. Data from the eye with less refractive error were used to determine prevalence.

resultsAmong 2 240 804 children (50.9% boys, mean age 11.5 years, SD ±3.3), the prevalence of SE myopia was 1.57% (95% CI 1.54% to 1.60%) at 5-9 years, 3.13% (95% CI 3.09% to 3.16%) at 10-14 years and 4.8% (95% CI 4.73% to 4.86%) at 15-18 years. Hyperopia prevalence was 0.59% (95% CI 0.57% to 0.61%), 0.54% (95% CI 0.53% to 0.56%) and 0.39% (95% CI 0.37% to 0.41%), respectively. When defined by spherical ametropia, these values for myopia were 0.84%, 2.50% and 4.24%, and those for hyperopia were 2.11%, 2.41% and 2.07%, respectively.Myopia was associated with older age, female gender, private school attendance, urban location and state. The latter appeared to be driven by higher literacy rates.

conclusionsRefractive error, especially myopia, is common in India. Differences in prevalence between states appear to be driven by literacy rates, suggesting that the burden of myopia may rise as literacy increases.

Indexed as

HyperopiaMyopiaRefractive ErrorsVision ScreeningChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMalePrevalenceSchoolsEpidemiologyOptics and Refraction

Identifiers

PMID36562766
PMCPMC10804007
OpenAlexW4311624985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.