ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023
Improving therapeutic synergy score predictions with adverse effects using multi-task heterogeneous network learning.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Computational approaches for drug-drug interaction prediction: a systematic review of data sources, modeling strategies, and evaluation frameworks.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- A review of deep learning approaches for drug synergy prediction in cancer.npj drug discovery · 2025Review
- Network-based estimation of therapeutic efficacy and adverse reaction potential for prioritisation of anti-cancer drug combinations.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Integration of molecular coarse-grained model into geometric representation learning framework for protein-protein complex property prediction.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug combinations could trigger pharmacological therapeutic effects (TEs) and adverse effects (AEs). Many computational methods have been developed to predict TEs, e.g. the therapeutic synergy scores of anti-cancer drug combinations, or AEs from drug-drug interactions. However, most of the methods treated the AEs and TEs predictions as two separate tasks, ignoring the potential mechanistic commonalities shared between them. Based on previous clinical observations, we hypothesized that by learning the shared mechanistic commonalities between AEs and TEs, we could learn the underlying MoAs (mechanisms of actions) and ultimately improve the accuracy of TE predictions. To test our hypothesis, we formulated the TE prediction problem as a multi-task heterogeneous network learning problem that performed TE and AE learning tasks simultaneously. To solve this problem, we proposed Muthene (multi-task heterogeneous network embedding) and evaluated it on our collected drug-drug interaction dataset with both TEs and AEs indications. Our experimental results showed that, by including the AE prediction as an auxiliary task, Muthene generated more accurate TE predictions than standard single-task learning methods, which supports our hypothesis. Using a drug pair Vincristine-Dasatinib as a case study, we demonstrated that our method not only provides a novel way of TE predictions but also helps us gain a deeper understanding of the MoAs of drug combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.