Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36562615›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis2023

Applied behavior analysis and the zoo: Forthman and Ogden (1992) thirty years later.

Eduardo J Fernandez, Allison L Martin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Animal-Visitor Interactions: Where Do We Go from Here?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. I'm Not Like the Others: Atypical Research Subjects in JEAB Publications.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025
    Review
  3. Pigeon in a Box:Perspectives on behavior science · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eduardo J FernandezSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5444-6604
Allison L MartinDepartment of Psychological Science, Kennesaw State University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2868-0899
Kennesaw State University · USThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of applied behavior analysis has been directly involved in both research and applications of behavioral principles to improve the lives of captive zoo animals. Thirty years ago, Forthman and Ogden (1992) wrote one of the first papers documenting some of these efforts. Since that time, considerable work has been done using behavioral principles and procedures to guide zoo welfare efforts. The current paper reexamines and updates Forthman and Ogden's original points, with attention to the 5 categories they detailed: (a) promotion of species-typical behavior, (b) reintroduction and repatriation of endangered species, (c) animal handling, (d) pest control, and (e) animal performances. In addition, we outline 3 current and future directions for behavior analytic endeavors: (a) experimental analyses of behavior and the zoo, (b) applied behavior analysis and the zoo, and (c) single-case designs and the zoo. The goal is to provide a framework that can guide future behavioral research in zoos, as well as create applications based on these empirical evaluations.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryApplied Behavior AnalysisAnimalsAnimals, ZooAnimal WelfareBehavior, AnimalHumansanimal traininganimal welfareapplied animal behaviorbehavioral engineeringenvironmental enrichmentzoos

Identifiers

PMID36562615
PMCPMC10107353
OpenAlexW4312103082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.