Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36562483›Full record

ArticleHealthcare management forum2023

Health technology, quality and safety in a learning health system.

Elizabeth M Borycki, Andre W Kushniruk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare management forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Human factors methods for designing safe health information technology: what do the experts think?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Co-Creation in the Development of Digital Therapeutics: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth M Borycki8205University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0928-8867
Andre W Kushniruk8205University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2557-9288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health technology quality and safety is an important issue for health informatics (i.e. digital health) professionals. Health technologies have been used to (1) collect data that can be analyzed to improve the quality and safety of healthcare activities and (2) re-engineer and/or automate error-prone processes. Health technologies are also able to introduce new types of errors (i.e. technology-induced errors) and have been implicated in propagating errors across digital health ecosystems. To develop a learning health system, health technologies need to be considered in terms of how they can improve the quality and safety of health activities traditionally carried out by humans (patients and health professionals) and also how the technology's quality and safety can be improved. This article outlines how this can be done by integrating evidence from health informatics research into practice using a learning health systems approach.

Indexed as

Learning Health SystemMedical InformaticsBiomedical TechnologyDelivery of Health CareEcosystemHumans

Identifiers

PMID36562483
PMCPMC9975897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.