Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36562028›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2022

The next generation of researchers: One-year outcome data from the SAEM Advanced Research Methodology Evaluation and Design in Medical Education (ARMED MedEd) program.

Michael Gottlieb, Teresa M Chan, Stefanie S Sebok-Syer, Sara Krzyzaniak, Nicole M Dubosh, Sally Santen, Holly Caretta-Weyer, Lalena Yarris, Wendy C Coates, Emergency Medicine Health Professions Education Research Consortium (EMPERC)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pathway for a Diverse and Sustainable Emergency Medicine Clinician-Scientist Workforce: Recommendations From the 2024 SAEM Consensus Conference.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael GottliebDepartment of Emergency Medicine Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-8375
Teresa M ChanDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-462X
Stefanie S Sebok-SyerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3572-5971
Sara KrzyzaniakDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.
Nicole M DuboshDepartment of Emergency Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8674-5334
Sally SantenDepartment of Emergency Medicine Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-8002
Holly Caretta-WeyerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9783-5797
Lalena YarrisDepartment of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1277-2852
Wendy C CoatesDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of California, Los Angeles Geffen School of Medicine Los Angeles California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3305-8802
Emergency Medicine Health Professions Education Research Consortium (EMPERC)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As the field of medical education evolves, there is a need to increase the quality of education scholarship and develop a cadre of research scholars; however, clinician educators (CEs) considering this career transition have limited formal training in education research methodology to heed this call. Therefore, a program that provides more advanced training in education scholarship for CEs without the financial and resource barriers of fellowships and masters programs is needed. Methods: The SAEM Advanced Research Methodology Evaluation and Design in Medical Education (ARMED MedEd) program is a longitudinal program for the beyond-beginner CE, seeking advanced training in education research. The program was created using a comprehensive needs assessment and included longitudinal training; small-group projects; dedicated project mentors; and integrated diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Program participants applied for a grant upon program completion. Results: Twenty-one participants completed the course with 100% completing the baseline survey and 67% (14/21) completing the end-of-program survey. Participants reported improved perception of knowledge across all of the topics with a medium to large effect size, ranging from 0.40 to 0.62. When asked about impact on their network of potential collaborators, participants reported a median of 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-8) out of 9. When asked about the impact on their community of practice, participants reported a median of 7 (IQR 5-7) out of 9. When asked about the impact on their professional identity, participants reported a median of 7 (IQR 4-9) out of 9. Participants also reported an increase in both the quantity (mean of 2 ± 1 new mentors) and the quality (median score 7 [IQR 5-8] out of 9) of new research mentorship as a result of the program. Open-ended feedback was generally positive, with 100% reporting they would advise others to take this program. Conclusions: The SAEM ARMED MedEd program represents a proof of concept for an advanced education research program seeking to fill the research training gap for the beyond-beginner Clinician educators.

Identifiers

PMID36562028
PMCPMC9763966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.