Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36561909›Full record

ArticlePublic health action2022

Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from the poultry production system in Nepal.

P Pal, R Bhatta, R Bhattarai, P Acharya, S Singh, A D Harries

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Public health action, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P PalAgriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan, Nepal.
R BhattaAgriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan, Nepal.
R BhattaraiAgriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan, Nepal.
P AcharyaAgriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan, Nepal.
S SinghAgriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan, Nepal.
A D HarriesInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingTwenty poultry farms in five provinces of Nepal were selected for studying bacterial pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns.

objectiveTo document the proportion of cloacal swabs collected from 3,230 broiler and 3,230 layer chickens from September to December 2021 that grew isolates of

designThis was a cross-sectional descriptive study.

resultsIn broiler birds,

conclusionThis study shows that a large proportion of poultry in Nepal are infected with potentially pathogenic bacteria, and these are frequently resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Nepal urgently needs to implement corrective measures.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancebroiler chickensEnterococcus sppEscherichia colilayer chickensNepalSalmonella spp.

Identifiers

PMID36561909
PMCPMC9716825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.