Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36561872›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2022

The evolution of research on depression during COVID-19: A visual analysis using Co-Occurrence and VOSviewer.

Qiannan Fu, Jiahao Ge, Yanhua Xu, Xiaoyu Liang, Yuyao Yu, Suqin Shen, Yanfang Ma, Jianzhen Zhang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qiannan FuCollege of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Jiahao GeCollege of Teacher Education, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Yanhua XuSchool of Geography and Environment, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
Xiaoyu LiangCollege of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Yuyao YuCollege of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Suqin ShenCollege of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Yanfang MaCollege of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Jianzhen ZhangCollege of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to public health problems, including depression. There has been a significant increase in research on depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little attention has been paid to the overall trend in this field based on bibliometric analyses. Methods: Co-Occurrence (COOC) and VOSviewer bibliometric methods were utilized to analyze depression in COVID-19 literature in the core collection of the Web of Science (WOS). The overall characteristics of depression during COVID-19 were summarized by analyzing the number of published studies, keywords, institutions, and countries. Results: A total of 9,694 English original research articles and reviews on depression during COVID-19 were included in this study. The United States, China, and the United Kingdom were the countries with the largest number of publications and had close cooperation with each other. Research institutions in each country were dominated by universities, with the University of Toronto being the most productive institution in the world. The most frequently published author was Ligang Zhang. Visualization analysis showed that influencing factors, adverse effects, and coping strategies were hotspots for research. Conclusion: The results shed light on the burgeoning research on depression during COVID-19, particularly the relationship between depression and public health. In addition, future research on depression during COVID-19 should focus more on special groups and those at potential risk of depression in the general population, use more quantitative and qualitative studies combined with more attention to scale updates, and conduct longitudinal follow-ups of the outcomes of interventions. In conclusion, this study contributes to a more comprehensive view of the development of depression during COVID-19 and suggests a theoretical basis for future research on public health.

Indexed as

COVID-19Adaptation, PsychologicalBibliometricsDepressionHumansPandemicsbibliometric analysisCOOC analysisdepression during COVID-19visualization analysisVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID36561872
PMCPMC9764011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.