Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36561871›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2022

Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.

Juan Jesús García-Iglesias, Juan Gómez-Salgado, Francisco Javier Fernández-Carrasco, Luciano Rodríguez-Díaz, Juana María Vázquez-Lara, Blanca Prieto-Callejero, Regina Allande-Cussó

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Suicide risk factors among Lithuanian medical doctors and residents.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Burnout and Suicidal Behaviours in Health Professionals in Portugal: The Moderating Effect of Self-Esteem.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan Jesús García-IglesiasDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
Juan Gómez-SalgadoDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
Francisco Javier Fernández-CarrascoDepartment of Obstetrics, Punta de Europa Hospital, Algeciras, Spain.
Luciano Rodríguez-DíazFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Ceuta, Spain.
Juana María Vázquez-LaraFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Ceuta, Spain.
Blanca Prieto-CallejeroDepartment of Nursing, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
Regina Allande-CussóDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Podiatry and Physiotherapy, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Universidad de Huelva · ESUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversidad de Cádiz · ESUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 has caused a series of economic, social, personal, and occupational consequences that may affect the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs), with the consequent risk of developing suicidal ideation and behaviors. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the main risk factors that may predispose HCWs to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A systematic review of studies published between January 2020 and August 2022 was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines in the following electronic databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Methodological quality was assessed using the critical appraisal tools for non-randomized studies of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The followed protocol is listed in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with code CRD42022340732. Results: A total of 34 studies were included in this review. There are a number of underlying factors such as higher rates of depression, anxiety, pre-pandemic lifetime mental disorders or previous lifetime suicide attempt, living alone, having problems with alcohol and/or other drugs, etc. that favor the emergence of suicidal tendencies and ideation in times of COVID-19. Similarly, the pandemic may have precipitated a series of factors such as economic concerns, assessing one's working conditions as poor, having family members or friends infected, changes in services or functions, and feeling discriminated against or stigmatized by society. Other factors such as age, sex, or type of healthcare worker show differences between studies. Conclusion: Organizations should ensure the adoption of strategies and programmes for early detection of suicides as well as increased attention to the mental health of professions with a high workload. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022340732.

Indexed as

COVID-19Suicide, AttemptedDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsSuicidal IdeationCOVID-19health personnelmental healthpublic healthrisk factorssuicide

Identifiers

PMID36561871
PMCPMC9767440
OpenAlexW4311633702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.