Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36561731›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine international2022

Comparative Effect of Multi-Dose Contrast Median on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Workflow of Nurses and Hospital Efficiency: A Multi-CenterReal-World Prospective Observational Study in China.

Chen Zhang, Zhilei Fan, Feng Ma, Da Li, Yingyao Chen, Yan Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chen ZhangKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0337-1400
Zhilei FanKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Feng MaKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Da LiKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yingyao ChenKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yan WeiKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9079-2379
Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate and compare computed tomography (CT)-contrast operational workflow and hospital imaging efficiency when using a multi-dose bulk IV contrast delivery system and when using a single-dose packaging contrast. Materials and Methods: A multi-center prospective observational study was conducted in six regions in China. The operating time and workflow of radiology nursing staff were evaluated and observed using an investigational tool and recorded by the investigators using a stopwatch. Nursing staff's knowledge and the imaging capabilities of hospitals were collected using a questionnaire. Rate, Results: A total of 42 radiology nurses and 1,167 CT contrast-operating procedures in six provinces in China were evaluated. The total operating times for the 100 ml contrast agent versus the 200 ml contrast agent were 80.67 s and 63.81 s, respectively ( Conclusion: Through difference and correlation analysis on real-world data, this study suggests that, considering safety, the use of a multi-dose bulk IV contrast agent is more time-saving and efficient for Chinese nurses and medical institutions compared with that of a single-dose package.

Identifiers

PMID36561731
PMCPMC9767742
OpenAlexW4311307275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.