ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Conducting Co-Design with Older People in a Digital Setting: Methodological Reflections and Recommendations.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Landscape, Evidence, Gaps, and Opportunities in Digital Mental Health Interventions for Older Adults: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- An Age-Adapted Co-Design Methodology for Community Health Research Involving Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- 'It felt like surveillance, not support': understanding barriers to enrolling older adults in an energy-linked digital health study during pandemic recovery and the cost-of-living crisis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- What social and environmental considerations are important for socially assistive robotic adoption for pre-frail older adults at home: a scoping review, life cycle assessment and survey.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Enhancing accessibility and impact of digitally enabled clinical trials: the WeShare engagement and equity toolkit.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Review
- First steps in co-designing an online patient decision support tool for enhanced medication management in older people.Australasian journal on ageing · 2025Article
- Grand challenge: addressing the global challenge of healthy aging.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Reimagining the frailty review: meaning, metrics, and the missed opportunity in global ageing care.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- An e-Learning Intervention for Professionals to Promote Family-Centered Cancer Care When a Significant Caregiver for Children Is at End of Life: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Cocreation of a Video Feedback Tool for Managing Self-Care at Home With Pairs of Older Adults: Remote Experience-Based Co-Design Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- How can equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) principles be incorporated into research excellence with industry and community partners? Lessons learned from Canada and Australia on projects with a dementia focus.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Developing a Multiprofessional Mobile App to Enhance Health Habits in Older Adults: User-Centered Approach.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Social activities in multidomain dementia prevention interventions: insights from practice and a blueprint for the future.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Strengths-based practice in adult social care: Understanding implementation.NIHR open research · 2024Article
- Protocol for a co-design study for the development of a chronotherapeutic mobile health behaviour change intervention targeting light exposure among older adults.F1000Research · 2024Article
- Implementation of a value-based approach for older people who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction: study protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Co-design has been identified as a participatory method to create person-centred integrated healthcare services that align with older people's values and lived experiences. Description: Existing guidelines on conducting co-design primarily focus on in-person methods with limited guidance on using digital methods to collect data. This gap in knowledge is particularly pertinent when co-designing with older people who can experience challenges with digital literacy and accessibility. This article uses the exemplar of a pilot site within a European co-design research project, aiming to create digital health technology to support integrated care, to describe the steps and considerations required when collaborating with older people in an online environment. Focus groups and one-to-one interviews were conducted utilising digital mediums of teleconferencing and telephone calls to engage and collaborate with older people. Discussion: Several preparatory steps are required to effectively bridge the digital divide and conduct co-design with older people including engaging gatekeepers, relationship and trust-building, assessing digital literacy levels, education and providing technological support. Conclusion: This article highlights the steps and considerations that researchers should be aware of when embarking on co-designing with older people in a digital setting. The authors describe their methods that promotes inclusivity and the empowerment of older people as equal collaborators in the research process. The co-design approach and recommendations can be applied to various research settings and wider areas of integrated care with this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.