Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36561538›Full record

ReviewOpen research Africa2022

Cost reduction strategies in the remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil.

Ismail B Ahmed, Eucharia O Nwaichi, Ejikeme Ugwoha, John N Ugbebor, Samuel B Arokoyu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open research Africa, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ismail B AhmedCentre for Occupational Health, Safety and Environment, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-7973
Eucharia O NwaichiDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6782-4632
Ejikeme UgwohaCentre for Occupational Health, Safety and Environment, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria.
John N UgbeborCentre for Occupational Health, Safety and Environment, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria.
Samuel B ArokoyuCentre for Research Management and Administration, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Petroleum hydrocarbon spill on land pollutes soil and reduces its ecosystem. Hydrocarbon transport in the soil is aided by several biological, physical, and chemical processes. However, pore characteristics play a major role in the distribution within the soil matrix. Restoring land use after spills necessitates remediation using cost-effective technologies. Several remediation technologies have been demonstrated at different scales, and research is ongoing to improve their performances towards the reduction of treatment costs. The process of removing the contaminants in the soil is through one or a combination of containment, separation, and degradation methods under the influence of biological, physical, chemical, and electrically-dominated processes. Generally, performance improvement is achieved through the introduction of products/materials and/or energy. Nevertheless, the technologies can be categorized based on effectiveness period as short, medium, and long term. The treatment cost of short, medium, and long-term technologies are usually in the range of $39 - 331/t (/tonne), $22 - 131/t, and $8 - 131/t, respectively. However, the total cost depends on other factors such as site location, capital cost, and permitting. This review compiles cost-saving strategies reported for different techniques used in remediating petroleum hydrocarbon polluted soil. We discuss the principles of contaminant removal, performance enhancing methods, and the cost-effectiveness analysis of selected technologies.

Indexed as

contaminated soilcost effectivenessPetroleum hydrocarbonsoil remediationtreatment cost

Identifiers

PMID36561538
PMCPMC9718438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.