Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36561533›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Predicting of axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer using multiparametric MRI dataset based on CNN model.

Xiaodong Zhang, Menghan Liu, Wanqing Ren, Jingxiang Sun, Kesong Wang, Xiaoming Xi, Guang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Deep learning-based breast MRI for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaodong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Menghan LiuDepartment of Health Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Wanqing RenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Jingxiang SunDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Kesong WangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China.
Xiaoming XiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China.
Guang ZhangDepartment of Health Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a multiparametric MRI model for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer. Methods: Clinical data and T2WI, DWI, and DCE-MRI images of 252 patients with invasive breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) group and non-ALNM group using biopsy results as a reference standard. The regions of interest (ROI) in T2WI, DWI, and DCE-MRI images were segmented using MATLAB software, and the ROI was unified into 224 × 224 sizes, followed by image normalization as input to T2WI, DWI, and DCE-MRI models, all of which were based on ResNet 50 networks. The idea of a weighted voting method in ensemble learning was employed, and then T2WI, DWI, and DCE-MRI models were used as the base models to construct a multiparametric MRI model. The entire dataset was randomly divided into training sets and testing sets (the training set 202 cases, including 78 ALNM, 124 non-ALNM; the testing set 50 cases, including 20 ALNM, 30 non-ALNM). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of models were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each model for axillary lymph node metastasis, and the DeLong test was performed, P< 0.05 statistically significant. Results: For the assessment of axillary lymph node status in invasive breast cancer on the test set, multiparametric MRI models yielded an AUC of 0.913 (95% CI, 0.799-0.974); T2WI-based model yielded an AUC of 0.908 (95% CI, 0.792-0.971); DWI-based model achieved an AUC of 0.702 (95% CI, 0.556-0.823); and the AUC of the DCE-MRI-based model was 0.572 (95% CI, 0.424-0.711). The improvement in the diagnostic performance of the multiparametric MRI model compared with the DWI and DCE-MRI-based models were significant (P< 0.01 for both). However, the increase was not meaningful compared with the T2WI-based model (P = 0.917). Conclusion: Multiparametric MRI image analysis based on an ensemble CNN model with deep learning is of practical application and extension for preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer.

Indexed as

axillary lymph nodebreast cancerconvolutional neural networkmagnetic resonance imagingmetastasis

Identifiers

PMID36561533
PMCPMC9763602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.