SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022
Diagnostic value of circulating lncRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Exploring the Clinical Landscape of Long Non-coding RNAs in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.Biochemical genetics · 2026Review
- Clinical value and regulatory role of lncRNA HOXB-AS3 in gastric cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic efficacy of long non-coding RNAs in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Identification of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs to predict prognosis and immune infiltration characteristics in alimentary tract malignancies.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- The Mission of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Human Adult Renal Stem/Progenitor Cells and Renal Diseases.Cells · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: With the prevalence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, a large number of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have attracted tremendous attention and have been the topic of extensive research on gastric cancer (GC). It was revealed that lncRNAs not only participate in the transduction of various signaling pathways, thus influencing GC genesis and development, but also have the potential for GC diagnosis. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of previous studies on GC. Materials and methods: An electronic search was made before August 2021 on databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Relevant articles that compare lncRNA expression in GC patients and healthy controls were summarized. We conducted a meta-analysis with the objective of evaluating the ability of lncRNAs in diagnosing GC. Results: A total of 40 original research studies including 6,772 participants were discussed in this meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75-0.81), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.83), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87), respectively. The value of pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) was 13.00 (95% CI: 10.00-17.00). Conclusions: This meta-analysis revealed that serum or plasma lncRNAs have high sensitivity and specificity, which makes lncRNAs clinically feasible in diagnosing GC. The results from this meta-analysis demonstrated that peripheral blood lncRNAs may become novel noninvasive biomarkers in the foreseeable future. At the same time, it should be noted that a greater number of blood samples and more evidence from rigorous multicenter clinical studies are necessary to justify their applicability as cancer biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.