ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2022
Real-world EUROCRINE
Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Accurate Interpretation and Clinical Significance of Morphological Features of Fine Needle Aspiration Cells in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is recommended by international guidelines for the preoperative evaluation of suspicious thyroid nodules >1 cm. Despite robust evidence from endocrine centers demonstrating the key role of FNAC results for the indication of surgery, the method is not routinely used in European clinics. The database EUROCRINE Methods: Operations performed to "exclude malignancy", registered from January 2015 to December 2018 in EUROCRINE Results: Of 8,791 operations, 5,780 had preoperative FNAC (65.7%). The overall malignancy rate was 28.3% (2,488/8,791). Malignancy rates were 68.8% for Bethesda VI, 69.9% for Bethesda V, 32.6% for Bethesda IV, 28.2% for III, 20.2% for Bethesda II, and 24.5% for Bethesda I. After exclusion of papillary microcarcinomas (PTMCs), the sensitivity of FNAC was 71.7% and specificity 43.5%, the positive predictive value was 29.1% and the negative predictive value 82.7%. Conclusions: Although the indication to "exclude malignancy" was the predominant reason that prompted thyroid resection in the present cohort, FNAC was only used in about 65.7% of cases. When performed, FNAC was associated with unexpectedly low accuracy. Interestingly, in Bethesda II, 20.2% of malignant entities were present (13.3% after the exclusion of PTMCs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.