Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36561430›Full record

ReviewSeminars in plastic surgery2022

Approach to Lymphedema Management.

Walter C Lin, Bauback Safa, Rudolf F Buntic

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Modern approaches to lymphatic surgery: a narrative review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Review
  4. LYMPHOSCINTIGRAPHY IN LYMPHEDEMA.Acta clinica Croatica · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Molecular pathophysiology of secondary lymphedema.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Robotics in Microsurgery and Supermicrosurgery.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Walter C LinDepartment of Surgery, The Buncke Clinic, San Francisco, California.
Bauback SafaDepartment of Surgery, The Buncke Clinic, San Francisco, California.
Rudolf F BunticDepartment of Surgery, The Buncke Clinic, San Francisco, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of people worldwide suffer from lymphedema. In developed nations, lymphedema most commonly stems secondarily from oncologic treatment, but may also result from trauma. More recently, lymphedema has been identified in patients after gender-affirmation phalloplasty reconstruction. Regardless of the etiology, the underlying pathophysiology involves blockage of lymphatic flow, resulting in lymph stasis, thus triggering a cascade of inflammation culminating in fibrosis and adipose deposition. Recent technical advances led to the refinement of physiologic and reductive surgeries-including lymphovenous anastomosis and free functional lymphatic transfer, which collectively encompass a variety of flap procedures including lymph node transfer, lymph channel transfer, and lymphatic system transfer. This article provides a summary of our approach in the assessment and management of the lymphedema patient, including detailed intraoperative photography and imaging, in addition to advanced technical considerations in physiologic reconstruction.

Indexed as

FFLTfree functional lymphatic transferlymphedemalymphovenous anastomosislymphovenous bypassLYSTsupermicrosurgeryvascularized lymph node transferVLCTVLNTVLVT

Identifiers

PMID36561430
PMCPMC9762993
OpenAlexW4309146478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.