Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36561209›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2022

In-hospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a semi-rural setting: An observational study on the implementation of a helicopter emergency medical services pathway.

E Ter Avest, M Tunnicliff, J Griggs, D Griffiths, D Cody, M Nelson, T Hurst, R M Lyon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

E Ter AvestKent, Surrey and Sussex Air Ambulance Trust, Redhill Airfield, Redhill, Surrey, UK.
M TunnicliffKent, Surrey and Sussex Air Ambulance Trust, Redhill Airfield, Redhill, Surrey, UK.
J GriggsKent, Surrey and Sussex Air Ambulance Trust, Redhill Airfield, Redhill, Surrey, UK.
D GriffithsKent, Surrey and Sussex Air Ambulance Trust, Redhill Airfield, Redhill, Surrey, UK.
D CodySouth East Coast Ambulance Service, UK.
M NelsonKent, Surrey and Sussex Air Ambulance Trust, Redhill Airfield, Redhill, Surrey, UK.
T HurstKings College NHS Trust, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, UK.
R M LyonKent, Surrey and Sussex Air Ambulance Trust, Redhill Airfield, Redhill, Surrey, UK.
Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust · GBKing's College Hospital · GBNorth East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouth East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) facilitated pathway for in-hospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for patients with an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in a semi-rural setting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with an OHCA attended by a UK HEMS service between 1 January 2018 and 20 September 2021, when a dedicated ECPR pathway was in effect to facilitate transport of eligible patients to the nearest ECLS centre. The primary endpoint was the number of patients meeting ECPR eligibility criteria at three pre-defined time points: at HEMS dispatch, during on-scene evaluation and upon arrival in hospital. Results: During the study period, 162 patients attended met ECPR pathway dispatch criteria. After on-scene evaluation, 74 patients (45%) had a return of spontaneously circulation before arrival of HEMS, 60 (37%) did not meet eligibility criteria regarding initial rhythm or etiology of the OHCA, and 15 (9%) had deteriorated (mainly into asystole) and were no longer suitable candidates upon arrival of HEMS. Eleven patients were eligible for ECPR and transported to hospital in arrest, and a further two patients were transported for post-ROSC ECLS. Nine patients deteriorated during transport and were no longer suitable ECPR candidates upon arrival. ECLS was successfully initiated in two patients (one intra-arrest, and one post-ROSC). Conclusion: In-hospital ECPR is of limited value for patients with refractory OHCA in a semi-rural setting, even when a dedicated pathway is in place. Potentially eligible patients often cannot be transported within an appropriate timeframe and/or deteriorate before arrival in hospital.

Indexed as

AED, Automatic External DefibrilatorCCP, Critical Care ParamedicECPR, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitationExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)Helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS)HEMS, Helicopter emergency medical serviceKSS, Air Ambulance Charity Kent, Surrey and SussexOHCA, Out of hospital cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID36561209
PMCPMC9763671
OpenAlexW4311984003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.