Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36561205›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2022

Higher education personnel's perceptions about telepresence robots.

Janika Leoste, Sirje Virkus, Aleksei Talisainen, Kalle Tammemäe, Katrin Kangur, Izabella Petriashvili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janika LeosteTallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Sirje VirkusSchool of Digital Technologies, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.
Aleksei TalisainenTallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Kalle TammemäeTallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Katrin KangurTallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Izabella PetriashviliDepartment of Education Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interest towards using telepresence robots in a variety of educational contexts is growing, as they have a great potential to enhance the educational experience of remote learners and provide support for teachers. This paper describes a study, examining the perception of Georgian university personnel about the use of telepresence robots in education. This exploratory research aimed to obtain evidence-based information on how the personnel (16 persons) from eight Georgian universities perceived the telepresence robots' role in enhancing learning and teaching, and what challenges, benefits, opportunities, weaknesses and threats would characterise these robots. The results of the study revealed that the university personnel perceived telepresence robots to have a great potential to enhance educational activities. In addition, the participants indicated the major challenges, benefits, opportunities, weaknesses and threats, regarding integrating telepresence robotics into the teaching and learning in Georgia. Recommendations for future research are also presented.

Indexed as

distance learninghigher educationliterature reviewperceptionstelepresence robots

Identifiers

PMID36561205
PMCPMC9766953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.