Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36561158›Full record

ArticleSpine surgery and related research2022

Early Experiences of One-Level Total Disc Replacement (Prestige LP) in Japan: A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes with Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion.

Kenichiro Sakai, Toshitaka Yoshii, Yoshiyasu Arai, Ichiro Torigoe, Hiroyuki Inose, Masaki Tomori, Takashi Hirai, Kyohei Sakaki, Yu Matsukura, Atsushi Okawa

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical management of bone loss in cervical total disc arthroplasty: literature review and treatment recommendations.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenichiro SakaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Toshitaka YoshiiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyasu AraiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Ichiro TorigoeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroyuki InoseDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki TomoriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Takashi HiraiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyohei SakakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Yu MatsukuraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi OkawaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In Japan, cervical total disc replacement (TDR) was approved in 2017. However, because of its short history, no comparative study between cervical TDR and anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) has been conducted in the country. Therefore, we examined and compared the surgical outcomes of TDR and ACDF for one-level cervical degenerative diseases. Methods: In total, 50 patients who had received anterior surgeries for one-level cervical degenerative diseases were investigated. Among them, 25 underwent TDR (Prestige LP; Medtronic), whereas the other 25 patients underwent ACDF. ACDF samples were selected from cases conducted before the approval of TDR (-2017.9) and were retrospectively judged to be indicated for TDR. Before and at 1 year after surgery, clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated. Results: No significant differences in terms of patient demographics between the two groups were observed. A longer operative time was observed in the TDR group than in the ACDF group. Postoperatively, no differences in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA) score, neck pain visual analog scale, C2-7 angle, and C2-7 range of motion (ROM) were determined. TDR tended to show better neck disability index (NDI) scores postoperatively when compared with ACDF. The local angle at operative level was larger in ACDF. In TDR, the local ROMs were maintained postoperatively; however, in ACDF, the local ROM at the operative level was decreased, and the local ROMs at adjacent levels were increased postoperatively. In the TDR group, although heterotopic ossification was observed in 11 patients (44.0%), and anterior bone loss was identified in 14 patients (56.0%), these issues did not affect surgical outcomes. Conclusions: Conclusively, no differences in terms of C-JOA score and neck pain between patients treated through TDR and ACDF were observed. However, a trend of better NDI scores was identified with TDR. While TDR maintained postoperative ROMs, ACDF showed an increase in the local ROMs at adjacent levels.

Indexed as

anterior cervical discectomy with fusioncervical degenerative diseasesCervical total disc replacement

Identifiers

PMID36561158
PMCPMC9747212
OpenAlexW4285205140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.