ArticleCurrent opinion in toxicology2020
Computational Biology and
Article in Current opinion in toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Boswellia serrata dry extract with intestinal anti-inflammatory properties also accelerates gastric ulcer healing in rats.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Virtual twins and the future of human developmental biology.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- Food and Drug Administration Expert Panel on Infant Formula "Operation Stork Speed" June 2025: Part 2, Regulatory and Safety Considerations.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Zebrafish navigating the metabolic maze: insights into human disease - assets, challenges and future implications.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Review
- Article
- Research trends of computational toxicology: a bibliometric analysis.Toxicology research · 2024Review
- Engineering a computable epiblast for in silico modeling of developmental toxicity.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Protecting Human and Animal Health: The Road from Animal Models to New Approach Methods.Pharmacological reviews · 2024Review
- Stem cell-based approaches for developmental neurotoxicity testing.Frontiers in toxicology · 2024Review
- Microglial Dynamics, Blood-Brain Barrier Morphogenesis, and Developmental Toxicity:Current opinion in toxicology · 2023Article
- Article
- Pluripotent stem cell assays: Modalities and applications for predictive developmental toxicity.Current research in toxicology · 2022Article
- Computational model for fetal skeletal defects potentially linked to disruption of retinoic acid signaling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New approach methodologies (NAMs) refer to any non-animal technology, methodology, approach, or combination thereof that can be used to provide information on chemical hazard and risk assessment that avoids the use of intact animals. A spectrum of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.