Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560969›Full record

ArticlePleura and peritoneum2022

Erector spinae plane blocks for day-case medical thoracoscopy: a pilot clinical study.

Jamie McPherson, Edward Halvey, Avinash Aujayeb

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pleura and peritoneum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jamie McPhersonAnaesthetic Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Edward HalveyAnaesthetic Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Avinash AujayebRespiratory Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Newcastle, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-5550
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks are a regional anaesthetic technique used for pain relief in thoracic procedures. Our centre has recently begun using ESP blocks pre-medical thoracoscopy for analgesia. Methods: Nine patients undergoing MT from September 2021 to February 2022 were included. Opioid use and depth of required sedation was recorded. Pre and post pain scores and at home were recorded by interview and review of charts. A functional pain questionnaire was administered via telephone. Results: Average greatest depth of sedation using propofol was 1.92 (standard error of mean [SEM] 0.27), with remifentanil 2.52 (SEM 0.46). 78% required oral analgesia on day 0 post discharge. 55% required oral analgesia on post-op day 1. Patients used an average of 3.33 mg oral morphine (SEM 2.35) in hospital, and 3 mg (SEM 2) on post-op day 1. Periprocedural pain scores were 0.66 (SEM 0.27). Pain scores in recovery were 1.56 (SEM 0.76). Pain scores 3-12 h post discharge were 3.56 (SEM 0.7), while pain scores on post-op day 1 were significantly higher at 5.56 (SEM 0.90) (Figure 1). Functional pain scoring showed patients doing activities of daily living well with a good ability to breathe and cough. All felt that their pain was well controlled on the day of the procedure and at home. No complications were reported. Conclusions: ESP blocks provide good analgesia. Pain scores showed significant analgesic effect lasting several hours. The project showed pain outcomes and patient acceptability were good for the use of regional anaesthesia.

Indexed as

erector spinae blocklocal anaesthetic thoracoscopymedical thoracoscopynerve block

Identifiers

PMID36560969
PMCPMC9742453
OpenAlexW4309007948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.