ArticlePleura and peritoneum2022
Erector spinae plane blocks for day-case medical thoracoscopy: a pilot clinical study.
Article in Pleura and peritoneum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review of Analgesic and Anaesthetic Approaches in Local Anaesthetic (Medical) Thoracoscopy.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Periprocedural pain management in pleural disease: a narrative review of current and emerging strategies.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Article
- The Evolving Role of Medical Thoracoscopy for the Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Peri-procedural cardiac arrest at medical thoracoscopy in a patient with pleural mesothelioma causing resultant heart failure and an intractable pleural effusion.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025Article
- Use of medical thoracoscopy in managing pleural malignancy.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024Article
- Beyond diagnosis: a narrative review of the evolving therapeutic role of medical thoracoscopy in the management of pleural diseases.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks are a regional anaesthetic technique used for pain relief in thoracic procedures. Our centre has recently begun using ESP blocks pre-medical thoracoscopy for analgesia. Methods: Nine patients undergoing MT from September 2021 to February 2022 were included. Opioid use and depth of required sedation was recorded. Pre and post pain scores and at home were recorded by interview and review of charts. A functional pain questionnaire was administered via telephone. Results: Average greatest depth of sedation using propofol was 1.92 (standard error of mean [SEM] 0.27), with remifentanil 2.52 (SEM 0.46). 78% required oral analgesia on day 0 post discharge. 55% required oral analgesia on post-op day 1. Patients used an average of 3.33 mg oral morphine (SEM 2.35) in hospital, and 3 mg (SEM 2) on post-op day 1. Periprocedural pain scores were 0.66 (SEM 0.27). Pain scores in recovery were 1.56 (SEM 0.76). Pain scores 3-12 h post discharge were 3.56 (SEM 0.7), while pain scores on post-op day 1 were significantly higher at 5.56 (SEM 0.90) (Figure 1). Functional pain scoring showed patients doing activities of daily living well with a good ability to breathe and cough. All felt that their pain was well controlled on the day of the procedure and at home. No complications were reported. Conclusions: ESP blocks provide good analgesia. Pain scores showed significant analgesic effect lasting several hours. The project showed pain outcomes and patient acceptability were good for the use of regional anaesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.