Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560712›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Symptomatic Chikungunya Virus Infection and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Nested Case-Control Study in French Guiana.

Célia Basurko, Najeh Hcini, Magalie Demar, Philippe Abboud, The CMFdeng Study Group, Mathieu Nacher, Gabriel Carles, Véronique Lambert, Séverine Matheus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Arboviruses and pregnancy: are the threats visible or hidden?Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Célia BasurkoCentre d'Investigation Clinique Antilles Guyane, CIC Inserm 1424, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Av des Flamboyants, Cayenne 97300, French Guiana.
Najeh HciniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, West French Guiana Hospital Center, Saint Laurent du Maroni 97320, French Guiana.
Magalie DemarLaboratoire Hospitalo-Universitaire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne 97300, French Guiana.ORCID 0000-0003-3414-0821
Philippe AbboudInfectious and Tropical Diseases Department, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne 97300, French Guiana.
The CMFdeng Study GroupCentre d'Investigation Clinique Antilles Guyane, CIC Inserm 1424, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Av des Flamboyants, Cayenne 97300, French Guiana.
Mathieu NacherCentre d'Investigation Clinique Antilles Guyane, CIC Inserm 1424, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Av des Flamboyants, Cayenne 97300, French Guiana.ORCID 0000-0001-9397-3204
Gabriel CarlesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, West French Guiana Hospital Center, Saint Laurent du Maroni 97320, French Guiana.
Véronique LambertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, West French Guiana Hospital Center, Saint Laurent du Maroni 97320, French Guiana.
Séverine MatheusIntensive Care Unit, Cayenne General Hospital, Cayenne 97300, French Guiana.ORCID 0000-0001-9171-1964
University of French Guiana · GFCentre Hospitalier Andrée Rosemon · GF

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the Chikungunya epidemic in the Caribbean and Latin America, pregnant women were affected by the virus in French Guiana. The question of the impact of the virus on pregnancy was raised because of the lack of scientific consensus and published data in the region. Thus, during the Chikungunya outbreak in French Guiana, a comparative study was set up using a cohort of pregnant women. The objective was to compare pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between pregnant women with Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection and pregnant women without CHIKV. Of 653 mothers included in the cohort, 246 mothers were included in the case-control study: 73 had CHIKV fever during pregnancy and 173 had neither fever nor CHIKV during pregnancy. The study did not observe any severe clinical presentation of CHIKV in the participating women. There were no intensive care unit admissions. In addition, the study showed no significant difference between the two groups with regard to pregnancy complications. However, the results showed a potential excess risk of neonatal ICU admission of the newborn when the maternal infection occurred within 7 days before delivery. These results suggest that special attention should be paid to neonates whose mothers were infected with CHIKV shortly before delivery.

Indexed as

Chikungunya FeverChikungunya virusCase-Control StudiesFemaleFrench GuianaHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPregnancyChikungunya virusFrench Guiananeonatal outcomespregnancypregnancy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36560712
PMCPMC9787529
OpenAlexW4311522326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.