Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560632›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Evaluation of Rapid Lateral-Flow Tests Directed against the SARS-CoV-2 Nucleoprotein Using Viral Suspensions Belonging to Different Lineages of SARS-CoV-2.

Sylvie Pillet, Julien Courtieux, Sylvie Gonzalo, Issam Bechri, Thomas Bourlet, Martine Valette, Antonin Bal, Bruno Pozzetto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Laboratory Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP Test.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sylvie PilletDepartment of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, CEDEX 02, 42055 Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0882-3162
Julien CourtieuxDepartment of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, CEDEX 02, 42055 Saint-Etienne, France.
Sylvie GonzaloDepartment of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, CEDEX 02, 42055 Saint-Etienne, France.
Issam BechriDepartment of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, CEDEX 02, 42055 Saint-Etienne, France.
Thomas BourletDepartment of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, CEDEX 02, 42055 Saint-Etienne, France.
Martine ValetteLaboratory of Virology, Institute of Infectious Agents, University Hospital of Lyon, BP 2251, 69229 Lyon, France.
Antonin BalLaboratory of Virology, Institute of Infectious Agents, University Hospital of Lyon, BP 2251, 69229 Lyon, France.
Bruno PozzettoDepartment of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, CEDEX 02, 42055 Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2603-8467
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the successive waves that occurred during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, recommendations arose to test symptomatic and contact subjects by using rapid antigen devices directed against the viral nucleocapsid protein with the aim to isolate contagious patients without delay. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of four rapid lateral-flow tests (RLFT) that were commercially available on the French market in 2022 to recognize various strains of SARS-CoV-2. Series of five-fold dilutions of seven viral suspensions belonging to different lineages of SARS-CoV-2 (19A, 20A, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron) were used to evaluate the analytical sensitivity of four commercially available RLFTs (manufacturers: Abbott, AAZ, Becton-Dickinson and Biospeedia). Cell culture and quantitative RT-PCR were used as references. Excellent correlations were observed for each lineage strain between the viral titer obtained via cell culture and the number of RNA copies measured by quantitative RT-PCR. Although the four tests were able to recognize all the tested variants, significant differences in terms of sensitivity were observed between the four RLFTs. Despite the limitation represented by the small number of devices and clinical isolates that were tested, this study contributed by rapidly comparing the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RLFTs in the Omicron era.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansNucleocapsid ProteinsNucleoproteinsSensitivity and SpecificitySuspensionsNucleocapsid ProteinsNucleoproteinsSuspensionscell culturelateral-flow rapid testnucleocapsid proteinquantitative RT-PCRviral lineages of SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36560632
PMCPMC9787475
OpenAlexW4310214169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.