Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560544›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

SARS-CoV-2 in Namibian Dogs.

Umberto Molini, Lauren M Coetzee, Tanya Engelbrecht, Lourens de Villiers, Mari de Villiers, Iolanda Mangone, Valentina Curini, Siegfried Khaiseb, Massimo Ancora, Cesare Cammà and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Umberto MoliniSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Namibia, Neudamm Campus, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek 9000, Namibia.ORCID 0000-0003-4146-4015
Lauren M CoetzeeCentral Veterinary Laboratory, 24 Goethe Street, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek 9000, Namibia.
Tanya EngelbrechtSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Namibia, Neudamm Campus, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek 9000, Namibia.
Lourens de VilliersSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Namibia, Neudamm Campus, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek 9000, Namibia.
Mari de VilliersSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Namibia, Neudamm Campus, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek 9000, Namibia.
Iolanda MangoneIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6716-091X
Valentina CuriniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2335-3154
Siegfried KhaisebCentral Veterinary Laboratory, 24 Goethe Street, Private Bag 13301, Windhoek 9000, Namibia.
Massimo AncoraIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7121-6373
Cesare CammàIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7547-1195
Alessio LorussoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, 64100 Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6156-8212
Giovanni FranzoDept. of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2991-217X
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale · ITUniversity of Namibia · NAUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

European Union 773830Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has focused the attention of researchers, and especially public opinion, on the role of the human-animal-environment interface in disease emergence. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, media reports regarding the role of pets in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused significant concern and social anxiety. Although nowadays proven negligible in developed countries, essentially no studies have been performed in low-income African areas where companion animals are often raised differently from high income countries, and the contact patterns occurring in these scenarios could affect the epidemiological scenario. An extensive molecular biology survey was performed from March 2022 to September 2022 on Namibian dogs residing in urban and rural areas, showing a low but not negligible SARS-CoV-2 prevalence (1%; 95CI: 0.33-2.32%) of 5 out of 500. In only one instance (i.e., a 4-year-old female Labrador) was there a clear association that could be established between the infections of the owner and animal. In all other cases, no evidence of human infection could be obtained and no episodes of COVID-19 were reported by the owners. Although no consistent evidence of pet-to-pet transmission was proven in the present study, a cautionary principle suggests intensive and dedicated investigation into companion animal populations, especially when animal contact is frequent and a particularly susceptible population is present.

Indexed as

diagnosisdogNamibiaSARS-CoV-2sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36560544
PMCPMC9785506
OpenAlexW4311494495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.