Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560533›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Real-World Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against Severe Outcomes during the Period of Omicron Predominance in Thailand: A Test-Negative Nationwide Case-Control Study.

Natthaprang Nittayasoot, Rapeepong Suphanchaimat, Panithee Thammawijaya, Chuleeporn Jiraphongsa, Taweesap Siraprapasiri, Kritchavat Ploddi, Chakkarat Pittayawonganon, Surakameth Mahasirimongkol, Piyanit Tharmaphornpilas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natthaprang NittayasootDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0807-9281
Rapeepong SuphanchaimatDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Panithee ThammawijayaDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Chuleeporn JiraphongsaDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Taweesap SiraprapasiriDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9922-1847
Kritchavat PloddiDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1855-3968
Chakkarat PittayawonganonDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Surakameth MahasirimongkolNational Institute of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Piyanit TharmaphornpilasDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Ministry of Public Health · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the widespread Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Thailand, the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines has become a major issue. The primary objective of this study is to examine the real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines based on secondary data acquired under normal circumstances in a real-world setting, to protect against treatment with invasive ventilation of pneumonia during January to April 2022, a period when Omicron was predominant. We conducted a nationwide test-negative case-control study. The case and control were matched with a ratio of 1:4 in terms of age, date of specimen collection, and hospital collection specimen and the odds ratio was calculated using conditional logistic regression. Overall, there was neither a distinction between mix-and-match regimens and homologous mRNA regimens against severe symptoms, nor was there a decline of the protective effect over the study period. The third and fourth dose boosters with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or mRNA vaccines provided high levels of protection against severe outcomes, approximately 87% to 100%, whereas two doses provided a moderate degree (70%). Thus, this study concludes that current national vaccine strategies provide favourable protective benefits against the Omicron variant. All Thais should receive at least two doses, while high-risk or vulnerable groups should be administered at least three doses.

Indexed as

COVID-19OmicronpneumoniaSARS-CoV-2Thailandvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID36560533
PMCPMC9785674
OpenAlexW4311397035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.