Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560525›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Vaccine Vigilance System: Considerations on the Effectiveness of Vigilance Data Use in COVID-19 Vaccination.

Diana Araja, Angelika Krumina, Zaiga Nora-Krukle, Uldis Berkis, Modra Murovska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Health and Well-Being through COVID-19 Vaccination: Physical, Oral, and Psychological Effects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diana ArajaInstitute of Microbiology and Virology, Riga Stradins University, 5 Ratsupites Str., LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-4558-0980
Angelika KruminaDepartment of Infectology, Riga Stradins University, 3 Linezera Str., LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-0594-1091
Zaiga Nora-KrukleInstitute of Microbiology and Virology, Riga Stradins University, 5 Ratsupites Str., LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.
Uldis BerkisDevelopment and Project Department, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema Str., LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Modra MurovskaInstitute of Microbiology and Virology, Riga Stradins University, 5 Ratsupites Str., LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-0971-1784
Riga Stradiņš University · LVRiga East University Hospital · LV

Funding

Latvian Council of Science lzp-2019/1-0380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The safety of medicines has been receiving increased attention to ensure that the risks of taking medicines do not outweigh the benefits. This is the reason why, over several decades, the pharmacovigilance system has been developed. The post-authorization pharmacovigilance system is based on reports from healthcare professionals and patients on observed adverse reactions. The reports are collected in databases and progressively evaluated. However, there are emerging concerns about the effectiveness of the established passive pharmacovigilance system in accelerating circumstances, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, when billions of doses of new vaccines were administered without a long history of use. Currently, health professionals receive fragmented new information on the safety of medicines from competent authorities after a lengthy evaluation process. Simultaneously, in the context of accelerated mass vaccination, health professionals need to have access to operational information-at least on organ systems at higher risk. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perform a primary data analysis of publicly available data on suspected COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse reactions in Europe, in order to identify the predominant groups of reported medical conditions after vaccination and their association with vaccine groups, as well as to evaluate the data accessibility on specific syndromes. (2) Methods: To achieve the objectives, the data publicly available in the EudraVigilance European Database for Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction Reports were analyzed. The following tasks were defined to: (1) Identify the predominant groups of medical conditions mentioned in adverse reaction reports; (2) determine the relative frequency of reports within vaccine groups; (3) assess the feasibility of obtaining information on a possibly associated syndrome-myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). (3) Results: The data obtained demonstrate that the predominant medical conditions induced after vaccination are relevant to the following categories: (1) "General disorders and administration site conditions", (2) "nervous system disorders", and (3) "musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders". There are more reports for mRNA vaccines, but the relative frequency of reports per dose administered, is lower for this group of vaccines. Information on ME/CFS was not available, but reports of "chronic fatigue syndrome" are included in the database and accessible for primary analysis. (4) Conclusions: The information obtained on the predominantly reported medical conditions and the relevant vaccine groups may be useful for health professionals, patients, researchers, and medicine manufacturers. Policymakers could benefit from reflecting on the design of an active pharmacovigilance model, making full use of modern information technologies, including big data analysis of social media and networks for the detection of primary signals and building an early warning system.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactions (ADRs)chronic fatigue syndromeCOVID-19 vaccinesEudraVigilanceneurological and autoimmune diseasespharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID36560525
PMCPMC9783025
OpenAlexW4312126307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.