Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560508›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Monkeypox Virus among Physicians in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Najim Z Alshahrani, Mohammed R Algethami, Abdullah M Alarifi, Faris Alzahrani, Eman A Alshehri, Aishah M Alshehri, Haytham Abdulwhab Sheerah, Abdelaziz Abdelaal, Ranjit Sah, Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Najim Z AlshahraniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-004X
Mohammed R AlgethamiMinistry of Health, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah M AlarifiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 13323, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4456-074X
Faris AlzahraniDepartment of Public Health, General Directorate of Health Affairs in Aseer Region, Ministry of Health, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6306-8342
Eman A AlshehriGeneral Directorate of Health Affairs in Aseer Region, Ministry of Health, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.
Aishah M AlshehriGeneral Directorate of Health Affairs in Aseer Region, Ministry of Health, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.
Haytham Abdulwhab SheerahHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abdelaziz AbdelaalHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3787-5970
Ranjit SahInstitute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-2695-8714
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesGrupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Faculty of Medicine, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de Las Américas-Institución Universitaria Vision de Las Americas, Pereira 660003, Risaralda, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9773-2192
Ministry of Health · SAHarvard University · USDr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune · INSaudi Electronic University · SAUniversidad Científica del Sur · PEUniversity of Jeddah · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing incidence of human monkeypox cases emphasizes the significance of prevention, early detection, and prompt responses for healthcare providers. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge and attitudes toward monkeypox infection among physicians, a frontline healthcare worker group, in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional survey assessing knowledge and attitudes towards monkeypox infection on multiple-item scales was sent to physicians in Saudi Arabia. The associations between independent factors and either knowledge or attitude were assessed. The final analysis included 398 participants. Approximately 55% of the surveyed participants had a "good knowledge" score about human monkeypox. The adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that being a female physician, working in the private sector, and having information on human monkeypox during medical school or residency years were the only factors associated with a good level of knowledge about human monkeypox. However, physicians' knowledge and attitudes regarding monkeypox infection are inadequate and influenced by various factors. There is a significant knowledge gap between the therapeutic management of monkeypox and its vaccination. Training and knowledge assessments are important, especially when studies show significant improvement in related and specific knowledge.

Indexed as

attitudeknowledgemonkeypox virusphysiciansSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID36560508
PMCPMC9781185
OpenAlexW4311855927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.