Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560414›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Influence of LINE-Assisted Provision of Information about Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer Prevention on HPV Vaccine Intention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Yu Ota, Kyoko Nomura, Nozomi Fujita, Tomoya Suzuki, Makoto Kamatsuka, Natsuya Sakata, Kengo Nagashima, Junko Hirayama, Naoko Fujita, Kuniko Shiga and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Factors Associated with HPV Vaccination Among Japanese Women: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the 7 C Vaccination Readiness Model.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yu OtaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 0108543, Japan.
Kyoko NomuraDepartment of Environmental Health Science and Public Health, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 0108543, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1453-4540
Nozomi FujitaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 0108543, Japan.
Tomoya SuzukiSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 0108543, Japan.
Makoto KamatsukaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 0108543, Japan.
Natsuya SakataSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Akita University, Akita 0108543, Japan.
Kengo NagashimaBiostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo 1608582, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4529-9045
Junko HirayamaDepartment of Environmental Health Science and Public Health, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 0108543, Japan.
Naoko FujitaLaboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Biological Production, Faculty of Bioresource Science, Akita Prefectural University, Akita 0100195, Japan.
Kuniko ShigaJapanese Red Cross Akita College of Nursing, Akita 0101493, Japan.
Noriaki OyamaDepartment of Gynecology, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita 0101495, Japan.
Yukihiro TeradaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 0108543, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a prospective, randomized two-arm, parallel group, and open label trial to investigate whether the use of LINE would increase HPV vaccine intention among not completely vaccinated university students. In June 2020, we recruited students aged between 18 and 35 years from four universities in Japan. Among the 357 enrollees (female, 53%), 178 and 179 participants were randomized into the LINE and Mail groups, respectively. At baseline, within three years, vaccine intention was observed in 40% vs. 42% of participants, respectively. At the first intervention, which provided similar PDF leaflets about HPV vaccine and cervical cancer prevention, there was no significant difference in vaccine intention between the two groups. However, at the second intervention of LINE-assisted knowledge intervention for 5 days per week for 7 weeks, the LINE group had a higher proportion of vaccine intention than the no intervention group (66% vs. 44%, OR: 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.59-4.35) in per-protocol analysis. The significance remained in the intention-to-treat analysis of multiply imputed datasets. Although LINE did not directly increase HPV vaccine intention compared to conventional posts, the LINE-assisted provision of information was effective in improving HPV vaccine intention among Japanese university and college students.

Indexed as

college/university studentshealth belief modelhealth literacyHPVhuman papillomavirus vaccineJapanknowledgevaccine acceptabilityvaccine intention

Identifiers

PMID36560414
PMCPMC9787927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.