Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560278›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors for the Early Detection of Balance Disorders in Parkinson's Disease.

Francesco Castelli Gattinara Di Zubiena, Greta Menna, Ilaria Mileti, Alessandro Zampogna, Francesco Asci, Marco Paoloni, Antonio Suppa, Zaccaria Del Prete, Eduardo Palermo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco Castelli Gattinara Di ZubienaDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3783-7272
Greta MennaDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy.
Ilaria MiletiMechanical Measurements and Microelectronics (M3Lab) Laboratory, Engineering Department, University Niccolò Cusano, 00166 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1064-7962
Alessandro ZampognaDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0227-1993
Francesco AsciDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0717-3521
Marco PaoloniDepartment of Anatomical and Histological Sciences, Legal Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0947-9711
Antonio SuppaDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9903-5550
Zaccaria Del PreteDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6057-7774
Eduardo PalermoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-8261
Sapienza University of Rome · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITUniversity Niccolò Cusano · IT

Funding

Sapienza University of Rome BE_FOR_ERC 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic posturography combined with wearable sensors has high sensitivity in recognizing subclinical balance abnormalities in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, this approach is burdened by a high analytical load for motion analysis, potentially limiting a routine application in clinical practice. In this study, we used machine learning to distinguish PD patients from controls, as well as patients under and not under dopaminergic therapy (i.e., ON and OFF states), based on kinematic measures recorded during dynamic posturography through portable sensors. We compared 52 different classifiers derived from Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network with different kernel functions to automatically analyze reactive postural responses to yaw perturbations recorded through IMUs in 20 PD patients and 15 healthy subjects. To identify the most efficient machine learning algorithm, we applied three threshold-based selection criteria (i.e., accuracy, recall and precision) and one evaluation criterion (i.e., goodness index). Twenty-one out of 52 classifiers passed the three selection criteria based on a threshold of 80%. Among these, only nine classifiers were considered "optimum" in distinguishing PD patients from healthy subjects according to a goodness index ≤ 0.25. The Fine K-Nearest Neighbor was the best-performing algorithm in the automatic classification of PD patients and healthy subjects, irrespective of therapeutic condition. By contrast, none of the classifiers passed the three threshold-based selection criteria in the comparison of patients in ON and OFF states. Overall, machine learning is a suitable solution for the early identification of balance disorders in PD through the automatic analysis of kinematic data from dynamic posturography.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseWearable Electronic DevicesAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPostural BalanceSupport Vector Machinemachine learningParkinson’s diseasepostural instabilityposturographywearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID36560278
PMCPMC9782434
OpenAlexW4312195580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.