ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Review of Botnet Attack Detection in SDN-Enabled IoT Using Machine Learning.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Literature Review of IoT Botnet DDOS Attacks and Evaluation of Detection Techniques.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- ROSPaCe: Intrusion Detection Dataset for a ROS2-Based Cyber-Physical System and IoT Networks.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Examination of Traditional Botnet Detection on IoT-Based Bots.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The orchestration of software-defined networks (SDN) and the internet of things (IoT) has revolutionized the computing fields. These include the broad spectrum of connectivity to sensors and electronic appliances beyond standard computing devices. However, these networks are still vulnerable to botnet attacks such as distributed denial of service, network probing, backdoors, information stealing, and phishing attacks. These attacks can disrupt and sometimes cause irreversible damage to several sectors of the economy. As a result, several machine learning-based solutions have been proposed to improve the real-time detection of botnet attacks in SDN-enabled IoT networks. The aim of this review is to investigate research studies that applied machine learning techniques for deterring botnet attacks in SDN-enabled IoT networks. Initially the first major botnet attacks in SDN-IoT networks have been thoroughly discussed. Secondly a commonly used machine learning techniques for detecting and mitigating botnet attacks in SDN-IoT networks are discussed. Finally, the performance of these machine learning techniques in detecting and mitigating botnet attacks is presented in terms of commonly used machine learning models' performance metrics. Both classical machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques have comparable performance in botnet attack detection. However, the classical ML techniques require extensive feature engineering to achieve optimal features for efficient botnet attack detection. Besides, they fall short of detecting unforeseen botnet attacks. Furthermore, timely detection, real-time monitoring, and adaptability to new types of attacks are still challenging tasks in classical ML techniques. These are mainly because classical machine learning techniques use signatures of the already known malware both in training and after deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.