Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560156›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Automated Machine Learning System for Defect Detection on Cylindrical Metal Surfaces.

Yi-Cheng Huang, Kuo-Chun Hung, Jun-Chang Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi-Cheng HuangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 40227, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4065-7731
Kuo-Chun HungDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua City 50007, Taiwan.
Jun-Chang LinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 40227, Taiwan.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology MOST 111-2221-E-005-081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal workpieces are indispensable in the manufacturing industry. Surface defects affect the appearance and efficiency of a workpiece and reduce the safety of manufactured products. Therefore, products must be inspected for surface defects, such as scratches, dirt, and chips. The traditional manual inspection method is time-consuming and labor-intensive, and human error is unavoidable when thousands of products require inspection. Therefore, an automated optical inspection method is often adopted. Traditional automated optical inspection algorithms are insufficient in the detection of defects on metal surfaces, but a convolutional neural network (CNN) may aid in the inspection. However, considerable time is required to select the optimal hyperparameters for a CNN through training and testing. First, we compared the ability of three CNNs, namely VGG-16, ResNet-50, and MobileNet v1, to detect defects on metal surfaces. These models were hypothetically implemented for transfer learning (TL). However, in deploying TL, the phenomenon of apparent convergence in prediction accuracy, followed by divergence in validation accuracy, may create a problem when the image pattern is not known in advance. Second, our developed automated machine-learning (AutoML) model was trained through a random search with the core layers of the network architecture of the three TL models. We developed a retraining criterion for scenarios in which the model exhibited poor training results such that a new neural network architecture and new hyperparameters could be selected for retraining when the defect accuracy criterion in the first TL was not met. Third, we used AutoKeras to execute AutoML and identify a model suitable for a metal-surface-defect dataset. The performance of TL, AutoKeras, and our designed AutoML model was compared. The results of this study were obtained using a small number of metal defect samples. Based on TL, the detection accuracy of VGG-16, ResNet-50, and MobileNet v1 was 91%, 59.00%, and 50%, respectively. Moreover, the AutoKeras model exhibited the highest accuracy of 99.83%. The accuracy of the self-designed AutoML model reached 95.50% when using a core layer module, obtained by combining the modules of VGG-16, ResNet-50, and MobileNet v1. The designed AutoML model effectively and accurately recognized defective and low-quality samples despite low training costs. The defect accuracy of the developed model was close to that of the existing AutoKeras model and thus can contribute to the development of new diagnostic technologies for smart manufacturing.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsLabor, ObstetricCommerceFemaleHumansMachine LearningManufacturing IndustryMetalsPregnancyMetalsautomated machine learning (AutoML)convolutional neural network (CNN)metal surface defect

Identifiers

PMID36560156
PMCPMC9784605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.