Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560150›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Iterative Online 3D Reconstruction from RGB Images.

Thorsten Cardoen, Sam Leroux, Pieter Simoens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Polarimetric Imaging for Robot Perception: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thorsten CardoenIDLab, Department of Information and Technology, Ghent University-imec, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1991-2478
Sam LerouxIDLab, Department of Information and Technology, Ghent University-imec, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3792-5026
Pieter SimoensIDLab, Department of Information and Technology, Ghent University-imec, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9569-9373

Funding

Flemish Government Onderzoeksprogramma Artificiële Intelligentie (AI) Vlaanderen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D reconstruction is the computer vision task of reconstructing the 3D shape of an object from multiple 2D images. Most existing algorithms for this task are designed for offline settings, producing a single reconstruction from a batch of images taken from diverse viewpoints. Alongside reconstruction accuracy, additional considerations arise when 3D reconstructions are used in real-time processing pipelines for applications such as robot navigation or manipulation. In these cases, an accurate 3D reconstruction is already required while the data gathering is still in progress. In this paper, we demonstrate how existing batch-based reconstruction algorithms lead to suboptimal reconstruction quality when used for online, iterative 3D reconstruction and propose appropriate modifications to the existing Pix2Vox++ architecture. When additional viewpoints become available at a high rate, e.g., from a camera mounted on a drone, selecting the most informative viewpoints is important in order to mitigate long term memory loss and to reduce the computational footprint. We present qualitative and quantitative results on the optimal selection of viewpoints and show that state-of-the-art reconstruction quality is already obtained with elementary selection algorithms.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithms3D reconstructiondeep learningedge computing

Identifiers

PMID36560150
PMCPMC9784066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.