ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Iterative Online 3D Reconstruction from RGB Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polarimetric Imaging for Robot Perception: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D reconstruction is the computer vision task of reconstructing the 3D shape of an object from multiple 2D images. Most existing algorithms for this task are designed for offline settings, producing a single reconstruction from a batch of images taken from diverse viewpoints. Alongside reconstruction accuracy, additional considerations arise when 3D reconstructions are used in real-time processing pipelines for applications such as robot navigation or manipulation. In these cases, an accurate 3D reconstruction is already required while the data gathering is still in progress. In this paper, we demonstrate how existing batch-based reconstruction algorithms lead to suboptimal reconstruction quality when used for online, iterative 3D reconstruction and propose appropriate modifications to the existing Pix2Vox++ architecture. When additional viewpoints become available at a high rate, e.g., from a camera mounted on a drone, selecting the most informative viewpoints is important in order to mitigate long term memory loss and to reduce the computational footprint. We present qualitative and quantitative results on the optimal selection of viewpoints and show that state-of-the-art reconstruction quality is already obtained with elementary selection algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.