ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Immunosensors-The Future of Pathogen Real-Time Detection.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- SELEX-Based Aptamer Technologies for Toxin Analysis: Screening, Optimization, and Computational Assisted Design.Toxins · 2026Review
- Biosensors for the detection of arthropod-borne veterinary viruses: A comprehensive review.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Smart Bioaerosol Monitoring: Advanced Sampling and Sensing across Environmental, Clinical, and Industrial Domains.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Advances in Cervical Cancer Diagnostics Based on Immunosensors: Innovative Approaches and Tumor Biomarkers.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Innovations to Combat Antibiotic Resistance in Critical Care: Tools for Targeted Therapy and Stewardship.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- ZIF-8@GOx@PtNPs driven three-mode portable biosensor: smartphone-assisted sensitive detection of EHEC O157:H7 in food samples.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- Comb-Tipped Coupled Cantilever Sensor for Enhanced Real-Time Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- N‑Terminal Conjugation of a Near-Infrared Photosensitizer to an Antibody for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Application and evaluation of a rapid detection method based on two-dimensional PCR technology for hypervirulentFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Label-Free Detection of Waterborne Pathogens Using an All-Solid-State Laser-Induced Graphene Potentiometric Ion Flux Immunosensor.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Hydrogel-Based Biosensors for Cancer Detection.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Review
- Study of the reusability and stability of nylon nanofibres as an antibody immobilisation surface.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2024Article
- A paradigm shift in the detection of bloodborne pathogens: conventional approaches to recent detection techniques.EXCLI journal · 2024Review
- Nanostructured biosensing platforms for the detection of food- and water-borne pathogenic Escherichia coli.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Review
- Multiplex PCR-Lateral Flow Dipstick Method for Detection of Thermostable Direct Hemolysin (Biosensors · 2023Article
- FeBiosensors · 2023Article
- Development of a New Lab-on-Paper Microfluidics Platform Using Bi-Material Cantilever Actuators for ELISA on Paper.Biosensors · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pathogens and their toxins can cause various diseases of different severity. Some of them may be fatal, and therefore early diagnosis and suitable treatment is essential. There are numerous available methods used for their rapid screening. Conventional laboratory-based techniques such as culturing, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are dominant. However, culturing still remains the "gold standard" for their identification. These methods have many advantages, including high sensitivity and selectivity, but also numerous limitations, such as long experiment-time, costly instrumentation, and the need for well-qualified personnel to operate the equipment. All these existing limitations are the reasons for the continuous search for a new solutions in the field of bacteria identification. For years, research has been focusing on the use of immunosensors in various types of toxin- and pathogen-detection. Compared to the conventional methods, immunosensors do not require well-trained personnel. What is more, immunosensors are quick, highly selective and sensitive, and possess the potential to significantly improve the pathogen and toxin diagnostic-processes. There is a very important potential use for them in various transport systems, where the risk of contamination by bioagents is very high. In this paper, the advances in the field of immunosensor usage in pathogenic microorganism- and toxin-detection, are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.