ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
A Mathematically Generated Noise Technique for Ultrasound Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound systems have been widely used for consultation; however, they are susceptible to cyberattacks. Such ultrasound systems use random bits to protect patient information, which is vital to the stability of information-protecting systems used in ultrasound machines. The stability of the random bit must satisfy its unpredictability. To create a random bit, noise generated in hardware is typically used; however, extracting sufficient noise from systems is challenging when resources are limited. There are various methods for generating noises but most of these studies are based on hardware. Compared with hardware-based methods, software-based methods can be easily accessed by the software developer; therefore, we applied a mathematically generated noise function to generate random bits for ultrasound systems. Herein, we compared the performance of random bits using a newly proposed mathematical function and using the frequency of the central processing unit of the hardware. Random bits are generated using a raw bitmap image measuring 1000 × 663 bytes. The generated random bit analyzes the sampling data in generation time units as time-series data and then verifies the mean, median, and mode. To further apply the random bit in an ultrasound system, the image is randomized by applying exclusive mixing to a 1000 × 663 ultrasound phantom image; subsequently, the comparison and analysis of statistical data processing using hardware noise and the proposed algorithm were provided. The peak signal-to-noise ratio and mean square error of the images are compared to evaluate their quality. As a result of the test, the min entropy estimate (estimated value) was 7.156616/8 bit in the proposed study, which indicated a performance superior to that of GetSystemTime. These results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the conventional method used in ultrasound systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.