Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560059›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Real-Time Human Activity Recognition with IMU and Encoder Sensors in Wearable Exoskeleton Robot via Deep Learning Networks.

Ismael Espinoza Jaramillo, Jin Gyun Jeong, Patricio Rivera Lopez, Choong-Ho Lee, Do-Yeon Kang, Tae-Jun Ha, Ji-Heon Oh, Hwanseok Jung, Jin Hyuk Lee, Won Hee Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ismael Espinoza JaramilloDepartment of Electronics and Information Convergence Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea.
Jin Gyun JeongDepartment of Electronics and Information Convergence Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea.
Patricio Rivera LopezAI Laboratory, DeltaX, Seoul 04522, Republic of Korea.
Choong-Ho LeeHyundai Rotem, Uiwang-si 16082, Republic of Korea.
Do-Yeon KangHyundai Rotem, Uiwang-si 16082, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5074-3716
Tae-Jun HaHyundai Rotem, Uiwang-si 16082, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Heon OhDepartment of Electronics and Information Convergence Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea.
Hwanseok JungDepartment of Electronics and Information Convergence Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea.
Jin Hyuk LeeDepartment of Electronics and Information Convergence Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea.
Won Hee LeeDepartment of Software Convergence, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Seong KimDepartment of Electronics and Information Convergence Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7118-1708

Funding

Hyundai Rotem 20201806Hyundai Rotem 20211680Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion 2017000655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable exoskeleton robots have become a promising technology for supporting human motions in multiple tasks. Activity recognition in real-time provides useful information to enhance the robot's control assistance for daily tasks. This work implements a real-time activity recognition system based on the activity signals of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and a pair of rotary encoders integrated into the exoskeleton robot. Five deep learning models have been trained and evaluated for activity recognition. As a result, a subset of optimized deep learning models was transferred to an edge device for real-time evaluation in a continuous action environment using eight common human tasks: stand, bend, crouch, walk, sit-down, sit-up, and ascend and descend stairs. These eight robot wearer's activities are recognized with an average accuracy of 97.35% in real-time tests, with an inference time under 10 ms and an overall latency of 0.506 s per recognition using the selected edge device.

Indexed as

Deep LearningExoskeleton DeviceRoboticsWearable Electronic DevicesHuman ActivitiesHumansdeep learning networksencodersinertial measurement unitreal-time human activity recognitionwearable exoskeleton robot

Identifiers

PMID36560059
PMCPMC9783602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.