Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36560041›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Offline User Authentication Ensuring Non-Repudiation and Anonymity.

Ya-Fen Chang, Wei-Liang Tai, Ka-Ho Fung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ya-Fen ChangDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung 404, Taiwan.
Wei-Liang TaiBachelor Degree Program of Artificial Intelligence, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung 404, Taiwan.
Ka-Ho FungDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung 404, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

User authentication is the key to ensuring that only authorized users can deal with specific affairs and access services. Applications or systems possessing different properties or requirements need different authentication schemes. For example, some institutions or companies need executives to manage or inspect their corresponding departments while the inspected department should not know who the executives are but only can verify their legitimacy. This paper designs a non-repudiation and anonymity-ensured user authentication system to meet the mentioned special requirements. We also propose a user authentication scheme to ensure that the designed system can work as claimed. In the system, a department is equipped with an authentication device, namely the department authentication device, to authenticate an executive while the executive's identity is not revealed to the department and only the department's authentication device can identify the executive for non-repudiation. An executive is equipped with an authentication device to have himself/herself authenticated by the department's authentication device. Moreover, authentication data stored in an executive's authentication device does not need to be updated even when management personnel changes are made.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityTelemedicineAlgorithmsComputer Securityanonymityauthenticationnon-repudiationofflinesecurity

Identifiers

PMID36560041
PMCPMC9781664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.