ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Correction and Accuracy of PurpleAir PM
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of sources and sinks of indoor particulate matter reveals insights into the real-world efficacy of portable air cleaners in a randomized intervention trial.The Science of the total environment · 2025Trial
- Calibration of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Exposure Assessment: A Critical Review.Current environmental health reports · 2026Review
- Validation of PurpleAir PMACS ES&T air · 2026Article
- Winter inversions and summer smoke: A season-dependent approach to PM₂.₅ modeling with low-cost sensors in complex terrain.The Science of the total environment · 2026Article
- Wildfire Smoke and Cardiorespiratory Emergency Visits in New Mexico 2022: Sensitivity to Exposure Estimates and Referent Periods.GeoHealth · 2026Article
- Review
- Hourly PMACS ES&T air · 2026Article
- Wildfire smoke-related PMEnvironment international · 2026Article
- PurpleAir Sensor Deployment Trends and Uncertainties.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A novel methodology for using light-scattering sensors to measure indoor particulate matter in a multi-site clinical trial.Discover Environment · 2026Article
- Assessing Indoor Versus Outdoor PMACS ES&T air · 2025Article
- Article
- Calibration of low-cost sensor data for ambient PMAtmospheric pollution research · 2025Article
- Seasonal effects in the application of the MOMA remote calibration tool to outdoor PMAtmospheric measurement techniques · 2025Article
- CyanoHABs and CAPs: assessing community-based monitoring of PMEnvironmental science: atmospheres · 2025Article
- Evaluating PurpleAir Sensors: Do They Accurately Reflect Ambient Air Temperature?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Skyrocketing pollution: assessing the environmental fate of July 4th fireworks in New York City.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Long-Term Performance of Six PMSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring Climate and Air Pollution Mitigating Benefits of Urban Parks in Sao Paulo Through a Pollution Sensor Network.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Correction: Barkjohn et al. Correction and Accuracy of PurpleAir PMSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PurpleAir particulate matter (PM) sensors are increasingly used in the United States and other countries for real-time air quality information, particularly during wildfire smoke episodes. Uncorrected PurpleAir data can be biased and may exhibit a nonlinear response at extreme smoke concentrations (>300 µg/m3). This bias and nonlinearity result in a disagreement with the traditional ambient monitoring network, leading to the public’s confusion during smoke episodes. These sensors must be evaluated during smoke-impacted times and then corrected for bias, to ensure that accurate data are reported. The nearby public PurpleAir sensor and monitor pairs were identified during the summer of 2020 and were used to supplement the data from collocated pairs to develop an extended U.S.-wide correction for high concentrations. We evaluated several correction schemes to identify an optimal correction, using the previously developed U.S.-wide correction, up to 300 µg/m3, transitioning to a quadradic fit above 400 µg/m3. The correction reduces the bias at each air quality index (AQI) breakpoint; most ambient collocations that were studied met the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) performance targets (twelve of the thirteen ambient sensors met the EPA’s targets) and some smoke-impacted sites (5 out of 15 met the EPA’s performance targets in terms of the 1-h averages). This correction can also be used to improve the comparability of PurpleAir sensor data with regulatory-grade monitors when they are collectively analyzed or shown together on public information websites; the methods developed in this paper can also be used to correct future air-sensor types. The PurpleAir network is already filling in spatial and temporal gaps in the regulatory monitoring network and providing valuable air-quality information during smoke episodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.