ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Signal Source Localization with Long-Term Observations in Distributed Angle-Only Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angle-only sensors cannot provide range information of targets and in order to determine accurate position of a signal source, one can connect distributed passive sensors with communication links and implement a fusion algorithm to estimate target position. To measure moving targets with sensors on moving platforms, most of existing algorithms resort to the filtering method. In this paper, we present two fusion algorithms to estimate both the position and velocity of moving target with distributed angle-only sensors in motion. The first algorithm is termed as the gross least square (LS) algorithm, which takes all observations from distributed sensors together to form an estimate of the position and velocity and thus needs a huge communication cost and a huge computation cost. The second algorithm is termed as the linear LS algorithm, which approximates locations of sensors, locations of targets, and angle-only measures for each sensor by linear models and thus does not need each local sensors to transmit raw data of angle-only observations, resulting in a lower communication cost between sensors and then a lower computation cost at the fusion center. Based on the second algorithm, a truncated LS algorithm, which estimates the target velocity through an average operation, is also presented. Numerical results indicate that the gross LS algorithm, without linear approximation operation, often benefits from more observations, whereas the linear LS algorithm and the truncated LS algorithm, both bear lower communication and computation costs, may endure performance loss if the observations are collected in a long period such that the linear approximation model becomes mismatch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.