ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Hand Gesture Recognition Using EMG-IMU Signals and Deep Q-Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lower Limb Motion Classification of Actions in Confined Environments Based on Multi-Source Signal Fusion and Muscle Symmetry Features.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Co-Located sEMG-pFMG Dataset for Hand Gesture Recognition Under Varying Arm-Position Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing the Resilience of sEMG Classifiers to Sensor Malfunction and Signal Saturation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Intelligent Dental Handpiece: Real-Time Motion Analysis for Skill Development.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Fast and Low-Impact Embedded Orientation Correction Algorithm for Hand Gesture Recognition Armbands.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- RETRACTED: Human swimming posture recognition combining improved 3D convolutional network and attention residual network.PloS one · 2025Article
- Context-informed incremental learning improves both the performance and resilience of myoelectric control.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Multi-domain-fusion deep learning for automatic modulation recognition in spatial cognitive radio.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Recognition of Hand Gestures Based on EMG Signals with Deep and Double-Deep Q-Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hand gesture recognition systems (HGR) based on electromyography signals (EMGs) and inertial measurement unit signals (IMUs) have been studied for different applications in recent years. Most commonly, cutting-edge HGR methods are based on supervised machine learning methods. However, the potential benefits of reinforcement learning (RL) techniques have shown that these techniques could be a viable option for classifying EMGs. Methods based on RL have several advantages such as promising classification performance and online learning from experience. In this work, we developed an HGR system made up of the following stages: pre-processing, feature extraction, classification, and post-processing. For the classification stage, we built an RL-based agent capable of learning to classify and recognize eleven hand gestures-five static and six dynamic-using a deep Q-network (DQN) algorithm based on EMG and IMU information. The proposed system uses a feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) for the representation of the agent policy. We carried out the same experiments with two different types of sensors to compare their performance, which are the Myo armband sensor and the G-force sensor. We performed experiments using training, validation, and test set distributions, and the results were evaluated for user-specific HGR models. The final accuracy results demonstrated that the best model was able to reach up to 97.50%±1.13% and 88.15%±2.84% for the classification and recognition, respectively, with regard to static gestures, and 98.95%±0.62% and 90.47%±4.57% for the classification and recognition, respectively, with regard to dynamic gestures with the Myo armband sensor. The results obtained in this work demonstrated that RL methods such as the DQN are capable of learning a policy from online experience to classify and recognize static and dynamic gestures using EMG and IMU signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.