ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Automated Detection of Substance-Use Status and Related Information from Clinical Text.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Natural Language Processing for Substance Use Disorder Information Extraction: A Systematic Literature Review.Current addiction reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop and evaluate an automated system for extracting information related to patient substance use (smoking, alcohol, and drugs) from unstructured clinical text (medical discharge records). The authors propose a four-stage system for the extraction of the substance-use status and related attributes (type, frequency, amount, quit-time, and period). The first stage uses a keyword search technique to detect sentences related to substance use and to exclude unrelated records. In the second stage, an extension of the NegEx negation detection algorithm is developed and employed for detecting the negated records. The third stage involves identifying the temporal status of the substance use by applying windowing and chunking methodologies. Finally, in the fourth stage, regular expressions, syntactic patterns, and keyword search techniques are used in order to extract the substance-use attributes. The proposed system achieves an F1-score of up to 0.99 for identifying substance-use-related records, 0.98 for detecting the negation status, and 0.94 for identifying temporal status. Moreover, F1-scores of up to 0.98, 0.98, 1.00, 0.92, and 0.98 are achieved for the extraction of the amount, frequency, type, quit-time, and period attributes, respectively. Natural Language Processing (NLP) and rule-based techniques are employed efficiently for extracting substance-use status and attributes, with the proposed system being able to detect substance-use status and attributes over both sentence-level and document-level data. Results show that the proposed system outperforms the compared state-of-the-art substance-use identification system on an unseen dataset, demonstrating its generalisability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.