Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36559970›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

IGWO-IVNet3: DL-Based Automatic Diagnosis of Lung Nodules Using an Improved Gray Wolf Optimization and InceptionNet-V3.

Anas Bilal, Muhammad Shafiq, Fang Fang, Muhammad Waqar, Inam Ullah, Yazeed Yasin Ghadi, Haixia Long, Rao Zeng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Anas BilalCollege of Information Science and Technology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7760-3374
Muhammad ShafiqSchool of Information Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing 655011, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3724-6528
Fang FangCollege of Information Engineering, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, China.
Muhammad WaqarDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan.
Inam UllahBK21 Chungbuk Information Technology Education and Research Center, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju-si 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5879-569X
Yazeed Yasin GhadiDepartment of Computer Science, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi 64141, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-7121-495X
Haixia LongCollege of Information Science and Technology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2202-3820
Rao ZengCollege of Information Science and Technology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2025-9904
Hainan Normal University · CNAl Ain University · AEChungbuk National University · KRCOMSATS University Islamabad · PKQujing Normal University · CN

Funding

Hainan Provincial key research and development plan of China ZDYF2021GXJS200Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 621QN241National Natural Science Foundation of China 62262019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence plays an essential role in diagnosing lung cancer. Lung cancer is notoriously difficult to diagnose until it has progressed to a late stage, making it a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Lung cancer is fatal if not treated early, making this a significant issue. Initial diagnosis of malignant nodules is often made using chest radiography (X-ray) and computed tomography (CT) scans; nevertheless, the possibility of benign nodules leads to wrong choices. In their first phases, benign and malignant nodules seem very similar. Additionally, radiologists have a hard time viewing and categorizing lung abnormalities. Lung cancer screenings performed by radiologists are often performed with the use of computer-aided diagnostic technologies. Computer scientists have presented many methods for identifying lung cancer in recent years. Low-quality images compromise the segmentation process, rendering traditional lung cancer prediction algorithms inaccurate. This article suggests a highly effective strategy for identifying and categorizing lung cancer. Noise in the pictures was reduced using a weighted filter, and the improved Gray Wolf Optimization method was performed before segmentation with watershed modification and dilation operations. We used InceptionNet-V3 to classify lung cancer into three groups, and it performed well compared to prior studies: 98.96% accuracy, 94.74% specificity, as well as 100% sensitivity.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSolitary Pulmonary NoduleAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansLungRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computedclassificationcomputed tomography (CT)computer-aided diagnostic system (CAD)deep learninggenetic algorithm (GA)gray wolf optimization (GWO)lung cancermedical image diagnosissegmentationtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36559970
PMCPMC9786099
OpenAlexW4311855701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.