Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36559950›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Survey on Deep-Learning-Based LiDAR 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving.

Simegnew Yihunie Alaba, John E Ball

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simegnew Yihunie AlabaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, James Worth Bagley College of Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3796-3201
John E BallDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, James Worth Bagley College of Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6774-4851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LiDAR is a commonly used sensor for autonomous driving to make accurate, robust, and fast decision-making when driving. The sensor is used in the perception system, especially object detection, to understand the driving environment. Although 2D object detection has succeeded during the deep-learning era, the lack of depth information limits understanding of the driving environment and object location. Three-dimensional sensors, such as LiDAR, give 3D information about the surrounding environment, which is essential for a 3D perception system. Despite the attention of the computer vision community to 3D object detection due to multiple applications in robotics and autonomous driving, there are challenges, such as scale change, sparsity, uneven distribution of LiDAR data, and occlusions. Different representations of LiDAR data and methods to minimize the effect of the sparsity of LiDAR data have been proposed. This survey presents the LiDAR-based 3D object detection and feature-extraction techniques for LiDAR data. The 3D coordinate systems differ in camera and LiDAR-based datasets and methods. Therefore, the commonly used 3D coordinate systems are summarized. Then, state-of-the-art LiDAR-based 3D object-detection methods are reviewed with a selected comparison among methods.

Indexed as

3D object detectionautonomous vehiclesclassificationdeep learningdeep learning for point cloud processingLiDARsparsity

Identifiers

PMID36559950
PMCPMC9784304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.