Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36559945›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Investigation of the Impact of Damaged Smartphone Sensors' Readings on the Quality of Behavioral Biometric Models.

Paweł Rybka, Tomasz Bąk, Paweł Sobel, Damian Grzechca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paweł RybkaDigital Fingerprints, ul. Żeliwna 38, 40-599 Katowice, Poland.
Tomasz BąkDigital Fingerprints, ul. Żeliwna 38, 40-599 Katowice, Poland.
Paweł SobelDigital Fingerprints, ul. Żeliwna 38, 40-599 Katowice, Poland.
Damian GrzechcaFaculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1391-8809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cybersecurity companies from around the world use state-of-the-art technology to provide the best protection against malicious software. Recent times have seen behavioral biometry becoming one of the most popular and widely used components in MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication). The effectiveness and lack of impact on UX (User Experience) is making its popularity rapidly increase among branches in the area of confidential data handling, such as banking, insurance companies, the government, or the military. Although behavioral biometric methods show a high degree of protection against fraudsters, they are susceptible to the quality of input data. The selected behavioral biometrics are strongly dependent on mobile phone IMU sensors. This paper investigates the harmful effects of gaps in data on the behavioral biometry model's accuracy in order to propose suitable countermeasures for this issue.

Indexed as

Biometric IdentificationCell PhoneBiometryComputer SecuritySmartphoneSoftwarebehavioral biometricsmachine learningMEMSMulti-Factor Authentication

Identifiers

PMID36559945
PMCPMC9784902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.