Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36559563›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Microbial Intervention: An Approach to Combat the Postharvest Pathogens of Fruits.

Sargam Verma, Lucas Carvalho Basilio Azevedo, Jyoti Pandey, Saksham Khusharia, Madhuree Kumari, Dharmendra Kumar, Kaushalendra, Nikunj Bhardwaj, Pratibha Teotia, Ajay Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The yeastFrontiers in fungal biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sargam VermaDepartment of Biotechnology, Noida International University, Noida 203201, India.
Lucas Carvalho Basilio AzevedoInstituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Campus Glória-Bloco CCG, Santa Mônica 38408-100, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6267-9587
Jyoti PandeyDepartment of Biochemistry, Singhania University, Jhunjhunu 333515, India.
Saksham KhushariaKuwar SatyaVira College of Engineering and Management, Bijnor 246701, India.
Madhuree KumariIndian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, India.
Dharmendra KumarDepartment of Zoology, C.M.B.College, Deorh, Ghoghardiha 847402, India.
KaushalendraDepartment of Zoology, Pachhunga University College Campus, Mizoram University (A Central University), Aizawl 796001, India.
Nikunj BhardwajDepartment of Zoology, Maharaj Singh College, Maa Shakumbhari University, Saharanpur 247001, India.
Pratibha TeotiaDepartment of Biotechnology, Noida International University, Noida 203201, India.
Ajay KumarDepartment of Postharvest Science, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO)-Volcani Center, Rishon Lezion 7505101, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3260-0807
Noida International University · INAgricultural Research Organization · ILIndian Institute of Science Bangalore · INMizoram University · INSinghania University · INUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants host diverse microbial communities, which undergo a complex interaction with each other. Plant-associated microbial communities provide various benefits to the host directly or indirectly, viz. nutrient acquisition, protection from pathogen invaders, mitigation from different biotic and abiotic stress. Presently, plant-associated microbial strains are frequently utilized as biofertilizers, biostimulants and biocontrol agents in greenhouse and field conditions and have shown satisfactory results. Nowadays, the plant/fruit microbiome has been employed to control postharvest pathogens and postharvest decay, and to maintain the quality or shelf life of fruits. In this context, the intervention of the natural fruit microbiome or the creation of synthetic microbial communities to modulate the functional attributes of the natural microbiome is an emerging aspect. In this regard, we discuss the community behavior of microbes in natural conditions and how the microbiome intervention plays a crucial role in the postharvest management of fruits.

Indexed as

biofilmfruit microbiomemicrobial interventionpostharvest management of fruitsquorum sensing

Identifiers

PMID36559563
PMCPMC9787458
OpenAlexW4312126586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.