Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36559558›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Mechanisms of Microbial Plant Protection and Control of Plant Viruses.

Lakshmaiah Manjunatha, Hosahatti Rajashekara, Leela Saisree Uppala, Dasannanamalige Siddesh Ambika, Balanagouda Patil, Kodegandlu Subbanna Shankarappa, Vishnu Sukumari Nath, Tiptur Rooplanaik Kavitha, Ajay Kumar Mishra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Deciphering the antiviral nature of endophyticFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lakshmaiah ManjunathaDivision of Crop Protection, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), Bengaluru 560089, Karnataka, India.
Hosahatti RajashekaraDivision of Crop Protection, ICAR-Directorate of Cashew Research (DCR), Dakshina Kannada 574202, Karnataka, India.
Leela Saisree UppalaCranberry Station, East Wareham, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 02538, USA.
Dasannanamalige Siddesh AmbikaDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Horticulture, University of Horticultural Sciences (Bagalkot), Bengaluru 560065, Karnataka, India.
Balanagouda PatilDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga 577255, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0026-0956
Kodegandlu Subbanna ShankarappaDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Horticulture, University of Horticultural Sciences (Bagalkot), Bengaluru 560065, Karnataka, India.
Vishnu Sukumari NathDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3001-7626
Tiptur Rooplanaik KavithaDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru 560065, Karnataka, India.
Ajay Kumar MishraKhalifa Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant viral diseases are major constraints causing significant yield losses worldwide in agricultural and horticultural crops. The commonly used methods cannot eliminate viral load in infected plants. Many unconventional methods are presently being employed to prevent viral infection; however, every time, these methods are not found promising. As a result, it is critical to identify the most promising and sustainable management strategies for economically important plant viral diseases. The genetic makeup of 90 percent of viral diseases constitutes a single-stranded RNA; the most promising way for management of any RNA viruses is through use ribonucleases. The scope of involving beneficial microbial organisms in the integrated management of viral diseases is of the utmost importance and is highly imperative. This review highlights the importance of prokaryotic plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria/endophytic bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungal organisms, as well as their possible mechanisms for suppressing viral infection in plants via cross-protection, ISR, and the accumulation of defensive enzymes, phenolic compounds, lipopeptides, protease, and RNase activity against plant virus infection.

Indexed as

antiviralBacillus spp. bacteriabioagentsendophytesplant virusresistance

Identifiers

PMID36559558
PMCPMC9785281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.