Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36559289›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Bioprinted Membranes for Corneal Tissue Engineering: A Review.

Amin Orash Mahmoud Salehi, Saeed Heidari-Keshel, Seyed Ali Poursamar, Ali Zarrabi, Farshid Sefat, Narsimha Mamidi, Mahmoud Jabbarvand Behrouz, Mohammad Rafienia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Type VIII collagen: advances in matrix biology and translational promise.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Biomaterials for Corneal Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Tissue Engineering and Ophthalmology.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Overview of Recent Advances in Nano-Based Ocular Drug Delivery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Amin Orash Mahmoud SalehiDepartment of Chemistry and Nanotechnology, School of Engineering and Science, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, NL, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8572-0992
Saeed Heidari-KeshelDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1434875451, Iran.
Seyed Ali PoursamarBiosensor Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673441, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-0947
Ali ZarrabiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istinye University, Istanbul 34396, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0391-1769
Farshid SefatDepartment of Biomedical and Electronics Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0911-5213
Narsimha MamidiDepartment of Chemistry and Nanotechnology, School of Engineering and Science, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, NL, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8842-4649
Mahmoud Jabbarvand BehrouzTranslational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1985717443, Iran.
Mohammad RafieniaBiosensor Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673441, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRTecnológico de Monterrey · MXFarabi Hospital · IRIstinye University · TRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Bradford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal transplantation is considered a convenient strategy for various types of corneal disease needs. Even though it has been applied as a suitable solution for most corneal disorders, patients still face several issues due to a lack of healthy donor corneas, and rejection is another unknown risk of corneal transplant tissue. Corneal tissue engineering (CTE) has gained significant consideration as an efficient approach to developing tissue-engineered scaffolds for corneal healing and regeneration. Several approaches are tested to develop a substrate with equal transmittance and mechanical properties to improve the regeneration of cornea tissue. In this regard, bioprinted scaffolds have recently received sufficient attention in simulating corneal structure, owing to their spectacular spatial control which produces a three-cell-loaded-dimensional corneal structure. In this review, the anatomy and function of different layers of corneal tissue are highlighted, and then the potential of the 3D bioprinting technique for promoting corneal regeneration is also discussed.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingcorneal tissue engineeringendotheliumepitheliumstroma

Identifiers

PMID36559289
PMCPMC9784133
OpenAlexW4311390631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.