Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36559231›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

The Effect of Voriconazole on Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation Recipients: A Real-World Study.

Yi-Chang Zhao, Chen-Lin Xiao, Jing-Jing Hou, Jia-Kai Li, Bi-Kui Zhang, Xu-Biao Xie, Chun-Hua Fang, Feng-Hua Peng, Indy Sandaradura, Miao Yan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yi-Chang ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9651-4457
Chen-Lin XiaoDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Jing-Jing HouDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Jia-Kai LiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Bi-Kui ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Xu-Biao XieDepartment of Urological Organ Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Chun-Hua FangDepartment of Urological Organ Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Feng-Hua PengDepartment of Urological Organ Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Indy SandaraduraSchool of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Miao YanDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3582-8305
Central South University · CNWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

Hunan Medical Association [HMA202001002]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant with a narrow therapeutic window. Tacrolimus exposure increased significantly during voriconazole co-therapy. The magnitude of this interaction is highly variable, but it is hard to predict quantitatively. We conducted a study on 91 kidney transplantation recipients with voriconazole co-therapy. Furthermore, 1701 tacrolimus concentration data were collected. Standard concentration adjusted by tacrolimus daily dose (C/D) and weight-adjusted standard concentration (CDW) increased to 6 times higher during voriconazole co-therapy. C/D and CDW increased with voriconazole concentration. Patients with the genotype of CYP3A5 *3/*3 and CYP2C19 *2/*2 or *2/*3 were more variable at the same voriconazole concentration level. The final prediction model could explain 54.27% of the variation in C/D and 51.11% of the variation in CDW. In conclusion, voriconazole was the main factor causing C/D and CDW variation, and the effect intensity should be quantitative by its concentration. Kidney transplant recipients with CYP3A5 genotype of *3/*3 and CYP2C19 genotype of *2/*2 and *2/*3 should be given more attention during voriconazole co-therapy. The prediction model established in this study may help to reduce the occurrence of rejection.

Indexed as

drug interactionkidney transplantationtacrolimusvoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID36559231
PMCPMC9785881
OpenAlexW4311728703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.